2022
DOI: 10.7189/jogh.12.12006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of universal newborn hearing screening: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The middle-income countries represented included Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Iran, Pakistan, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia and Turkey. The participant numbers varied across the included reviews, with sample sizes of the meta-analyses ranging from 58 participants with neuromotor delay [22] to 1,023,610 newborns evaluated for early screening for hearing loss [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The middle-income countries represented included Bangladesh, China, Egypt, India, Iran, Pakistan, South Africa, Thailand, Tunisia and Turkey. The participant numbers varied across the included reviews, with sample sizes of the meta-analyses ranging from 58 participants with neuromotor delay [22] to 1,023,610 newborns evaluated for early screening for hearing loss [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcomes and impacts varied across the studies, ranging from reduction in core symptoms for ASD, improved cognitive function and adaptive behaviour, to neuroprotection and improved sitting balance. Table 2 provides a summary of studies focusing on various disabilities and their corresponding evidence for children under 5 years [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Data that were not disaggregated are presented in Additional file 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The participant numbers varied across the included reviews, with sample sizes of the meta-analyses ranging from 58 participants with neuromotor delay 23 to 1,023,610 newborns evaluated for early screening for hearing loss. 24 Regarding quality review, this umbrella review includes a majority of reviews (n = 16, 89%) with high and moderate con dence (nine reviews and seven reviews respectively) and two reviews (11%) of low con dence (Web appendix 2 show the results of the risk of bias assessment of each study with the AMSTAR tool, including the studies that were not disaggregated by age). The most common reasons for low con dence included a combination of the absence of an explicit statement regarding the establishment of review methods before conducting the review, the lack of a list detailing excluded studies and justifying these exclusions, and inadequate investigation of publication bias.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The synthesis of reviews on prevention for CP highlights the e cacy of interventions such as antenatal corticosteroids, 27 magnesium sulfate, 27 prophylactic caffeine, 28 and neonatal therapeutic hypothermia 28 24 Regarding ADHD, neurocognitive and behavioural interventions may reduce ADHD symptoms and positively in uence working memory. 38 The ndings suggest that diagnostic tools for ASD can be useful in early detection, but each test may have varying levels of sensitivity and speci city.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hearing assessment should also form part of follow-up, 125 as prompt identification of hearing impairment and intervention (assistive devices, speech therapy) may improve outcomes. 126 Hearing impairment may also result from ototoxic antibiotic use, particularly where routine monitoring may not be possible. 127 …”
Section: Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%