1991
DOI: 10.1016/0300-483x(91)90139-r
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Effectiveness of N-acetylcysteine in protecting against mercuric chloride-induced nephrotoxicity

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
50
11
6
1

Citation Types

1
38
1
0

Year Published

Range
1993
1993
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
56
9

Relationship

1
64

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 65 publications

(40 citation statements)
references

References 23 publications

1
38
1
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…It is specula tive as to whether a larger dose of GE would prevent cellular injury following MC although we suspect not, as in vitro studies using rabbit proximal tubular epithelial cells in culture suggest that the pathogenesis of cellular injury fol lowing M exposure involves more than an interaction with thiol groups [40]. The effects of GE noted in our study confirm the preliminary observations of Naganuma et al [33] and are similar to those previously reported for DTT [13,14,35], N-acetylcysteine [13] and captopril [16]. Of interest, the protection associated with DTT treatment occurs in the absence of any change in M accumulation within the total kidney [14] or renal cortex [15] and even though it does not restore renal sulfhydryl status or the activity of Mg-or Na, K-ATPase [41].…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Previous studies that we [11] and others [12] have conducted, demonstrate that GSH depletion selectively reduces mercury accumulation within the kidney, but increases mortality following MC. However, these observations are contrary to the recent report of Girardi and Elias [13], who reported that GSH depletion increased renal M accumulation and augmented nephrotoxicity. We [11] have also suggested that MC ne phrotoxicity is enhanced following GSH depletion, al though Johnson [12] noted a moderation of MC-induced tubular dysfunction in this circumstance.…”
Section: Introduction
contrasting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation