Effectiveness of Global Postural Re-Education in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

González-Medina, Gloria; Pérez-Cabezas, Verónica; Ruiz-Molinero, Carmen; Chamorro-Moriana, Gema; Jiménez‐Rejano, José‐Jesús; Galán-Mercant, Alejandro

doi:10.3390/jcm10225327

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 41 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the same follow up, GPR sessions show better results in flexibility than an analytic stretching program [26] and an important reduction of pain. Several other clinical trials have evaluated the effects of GPR treatments measuring low back pain, neck pain, quality of life, or evaluating disability questionnaires, with strong evidence of GPR as an effective method for treating spinal disorders [27,28].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of a Single Global Stretching Session on Plantar Pressure and Lumbar Mobility Measured in Sedentary Young Adults. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Lozano-Quijada,

Toledo-Marhuenda,

Segura-Heras

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To assess the short-term impact of a single global stretching session on plantar pressures and lumbar range of motion (RoM) over one week in sedentary university students. Design: A randomised controlled trial with two parallel groups. Participants: Sixty-four university students were randomly assigned to a stretching group or control group. The stretching group received a single session of global stretching and the control group remained seated for the same length of time as the stretching session. Main outcome measures: Lumbar RoM and plantar pressures were assessed before, immediately after, 48 hours after, and 7 days after intervention. Results: Group-by-time interaction was significant for lumbar lateral flexion (p = 0.044), right maximal pressure (p = 0.003), left maximal pressure (p = 0.008), right mean pressure (p = 0.025), left mean pressure (p = 0.002), and maximal pressure minus mean pressure in right foot (p = 0.007). The model with plantar pressures showed a significant difference for group-by-time interaction (p = 0.010).Conclusion: Global stretching seems to counteract the ill-effects of prolonged sitting up to seven days with respect to plantar pressure in standing without improving lumbar ROM

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of a Single Global Stretching Session on Plantar Pressure and Lumbar Mobility Measured in Sedentary Young Adults. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Lozano-Quijada,

Toledo-Marhuenda,

Segura-Heras

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Past intervention studies have indicated that single postural re-education intervention can reduce pain and disability in acute and chronic low back pain patient [ 64 , 65 ]. This result is consistent with the recent meta-analysis on postural re-education for CLBP [ 66 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Different Trunk Training Methods for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis

Sutanto

Poon

et al. 2022

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing motor control, isometric, and isotonic trunk training intervention for pain, disability, and re-injury risk reduction in chronic low back pain patients. The EMBASE, MEDLINE, CENTRAL, PsycINFO, SPORTDiscus, and CINAHL databases were searched from inception until 25 February 2021 for chronic low back pain intervention based on any trunk training. Outcomes include the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) for disability, the Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for pain, and the Sorensen Test (ST) for future risk of re-injury. Isometric training was superior to the control with a mean difference (MD) = −1.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) [−2.30, −1.01] in pain reduction; MD = −7.94, 95% CI [−10.29, −5.59] in ODI; MD = −3.21, 95% CI [−4.83, −1.60] in RMDQ; and MD = 56.35 s, 95% CI [51.81 s, 60.90 s] in ST. Motor control was superior to the control with a MD = −2.44, 95% CI [−3.10, −1.79] in NPRS; MD = −8.32, 95% CI [−13.43, −3.22] in ODI; and MD = −3.58, 95% CI [−5.13, −2.03] in RMDQ. Isometric and motor control methods can effectively reduce pain and disability, with the isometric method reducing re-injury risk.

show abstract

“…Wong et al [6] concluded that physical inactivity could explain this functional limitation and stressed the importance of following a programme of physical activity. In this respect, a global postural re-education program is effective compared to other exercise programmes in subjects with persistent chronic low back pain [71].…”

Section: Functional Limitationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Differences by Sex: A Longitudinal Study

Pericot-Mozo,

Suñer-Soler,

Reig-Garcia

et al. 2024

JPM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: The experience of chronic low back pain has a significant impact on the quality of life of affected people, resulting in difficulties in performing basic activities of daily living. Aim: To study the perceived quality of life of people affected by chronic low back pain and the associated factors by sex. Methods: A prospective, longitudinal and observational design was used. Results: A total of 129 people (58.1% women) with chronic low back pain were studied. The mean pain intensity scores were of moderate severity (6.42 points), with a modest improvement at follow-up (6.17 points). Epidural nerve blocks were the most effective therapeutic intervention in reducing the intensity of pain. Participants described a negative perception of their health with regard to quality of life, with low scores for the two constructs both at baseline (health index, 0.444; perception of health, 38.76 points) and at follow-up (health index, 0.447; perception of health, 40.43 points). Participants had severe functional limitation scores (50.79 points). The results were significantly better among men. There was an inverse relationship between the average pain intensity (β = −0.304; p < 0.001), functional limitation (β = −0.466; p < 0.001) and mental health (β = −0.565; p < 0.001) and quality of life. Conclusions: The chronification of low back pain complicates people’s biopsychosocial adaptation to life. There is a longitudinal inverse association between pain and functional limitation and health-related quality of life.

show abstract

Effectiveness of Global Postural Re-Education in Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Cited by 6 publications

References 41 publications

Effects of a Single Global Stretching Session on Plantar Pressure and Lumbar Mobility Measured in Sedentary Young Adults. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Effects of a Single Global Stretching Session on Plantar Pressure and Lumbar Mobility Measured in Sedentary Young Adults. A Randomised Controlled Trial

Effects of Different Trunk Training Methods for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Meta-Analysis

Quality of Life in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain and Differences by Sex: A Longitudinal Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About