2011
DOI: 10.5581/1516-8484.20110097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness of confidential unit exclusion in screening blood donors of the regional blood bank in Londrina, Paraná State

Abstract: BackgroundFor transfusion purposes, blood donors must be accepted both in clinical and serological evaluations and must not have excluded their own donation using the confidential unit exclusion.AimThe objective of this study was to verify whether blood donors who choose self exclusion are more likely to be positive in serological tests than donors who do not.MethodsA cross-sectional analysis was carried out of 51,861 consecutive whole blood donations from January 2004 to December 2008 at a public blood bank i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
12
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study, about 2% of the first-time donors used the CUE option (CUE-positive), while only 0.8% of repeated and regular donors did. This rate of CUE positivity among the first-time donors in our study is lower than that in the study of Vogler et al [26], who reported about 5% CUE positivity among their first-time donors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…In our study, about 2% of the first-time donors used the CUE option (CUE-positive), while only 0.8% of repeated and regular donors did. This rate of CUE positivity among the first-time donors in our study is lower than that in the study of Vogler et al [26], who reported about 5% CUE positivity among their first-time donors.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 88%
“…The reduced functional capacity of patients with cGVHD has been confirmed by measurements made in the tests 2MWT (15,53,61,70,71,81,84,85), HGS (15,53,61,71,81,85,86), forced expiratory volume (FEV 1 ) (15,53,86,87), ROM (53,61,84,85) and P-ROM (84). Such functional decline is more marked in patients ≥60 years (70) or with overlap syndrome (as indicated by a longer 2MWT in both cases) (15).…”
Section: Clinical Manifestations Of Cgvhd: Implications For Patients’mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…However, studies performed in Uberaba, State of Minas Gerais and Londrina, State of Paraná, showed higher self-exclusion rates (2.7 and 3.2%, respectively) 57,58 . Although no clinical or epidemiological variables were related to CSE in this study, previous studies have shown that males and fi rst-time donors respond yes on the CSE form more frequently 28,[57][58][59][60] . However, the greater the number of repeated donations, the fewer times the CSE form was used to self-exclude the donor's blood 57,60 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The main factors related to problems with the CSE form are the diffi culty of understanding the question 26,28,57,58 , the low socioeconomic status of the donors 58,59 , and the ineffective explanations by health professionals 58 . Another aspect to be considered is the varied format and content of the form, which are different for each blood bank 57,58 . It was shown that blood banks that use forms with plain text and color pictures have a lower frequency of affi rmative responses to the self-exclusion choice, leading to a reduction in the disposal of low-risk blood bags and to an increase in the sensitivity of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation