2016
DOI: 10.5935/0034-7280.20160045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectiveness and safety of endothelial keratoplasty for pseudophakic and aphakic bullous keratopathy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials and cohort studies

Abstract: Objective: For nearly a century, penetrating keratoplasty has been the surgical technique of choice in the management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 At present, the only available choice for treating corneal endothelial dysfunction is corneal endothelial transplantation. 7,8,28 A possible alternative could be to use strategies that save partially damaged endothelial cells from apoptosis and help promote their repair and regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…17 At present, the only available choice for treating corneal endothelial dysfunction is corneal endothelial transplantation. 7,8,28 A possible alternative could be to use strategies that save partially damaged endothelial cells from apoptosis and help promote their repair and regeneration.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] Thus, despite advances, pseudophakic corneal edema remains a leading indication for endothelial keratoplasty. 7,8 In this study, we standardized an ex vivo model of corneal endothelial cell injury using phacoemulsification in porcine eyes and further evaluated the effect of corneal mesenchymal stromal cell secretome as a new therapy to reduce corneal endothelial cell loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%