1997
DOI: 10.1016/0017-9310(96)00156-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective thermal conductivity of nonlinear composite media with contact resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these method has been successfully used for the measurement with high accuracy, much attention should be paid to eliminate thermal contact resistance between the sensor and the specimen (13,14,15) . Since the resistance depends on the contact pressure, clamping both specimens tightly is important for the measurement (5,6,11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these method has been successfully used for the measurement with high accuracy, much attention should be paid to eliminate thermal contact resistance between the sensor and the specimen (13,14,15) . Since the resistance depends on the contact pressure, clamping both specimens tightly is important for the measurement (5,6,11) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that the improved lower bound (18) represents a remarkable improvement over the Ponte Castañeda bound (19). Also, notice that the elementary upper bound (17) and the improved lower bound (18) are practically indistinguishable. This fact is confirmed by the data in Table I, which contains the maximal values of the difference h i t of bounds (17) and (18) with respect to and  for all the microstructures considered here.…”
Section: The Comparison Materials and Characterization Of The Microstrmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Also, notice that the elementary upper bound (17) and the improved lower bound (18) are practically indistinguishable. This fact is confirmed by the data in Table I, which contains the maximal values of the difference h i t of bounds (17) and (18) with respect to and  for all the microstructures considered here. The values in the first line are of max .h i t / for 2 OE 2, 5 and  D 0.5, whereas the values in the other two lines are of max  .h i t / for  2 OE0,  p /, where  p is the corresponding percolation value of the porosity Â, for D 2 (second line) and D 20 (third line), respectively.…”
Section: The Comparison Materials and Characterization Of The Microstrmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ni et al (1997) applied the perturbation expansion method to nonlinear mixtures containing low-particle-volume concentrations of cylindrical particles with interfacial thermal resistance and derived formulas for linear and nonlinear effective thermal conductivities. Ni et al (1997) applied the perturbation expansion method to nonlinear mixtures containing low-particle-volume concentrations of cylindrical particles with interfacial thermal resistance and derived formulas for linear and nonlinear effective thermal conductivities.…”
Section: Interfacial Thermal Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%