1990
DOI: 10.1016/0148-9062(90)95253-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective failure modes and stability of slopes in rock mass with two discontinuity sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of the slide-topple mechanism is attributed to the fully persistent nature of the rear release (toppling) discontinuity set which can act as a single column when the rock mass is confined and/ or the block size is small enough relative to the size of the slope. This phenomenon had previously been described by Aydan et al (1989) for base friction physical models with fully persistent discontinuities. These findings therefore suggest that classification schemes such as proposed by Ashby (1971) and toppling nomograms (Choquet and Tanon 1985) should only be applied when investigating the stability of an individual rock block, a rock mass with discontinuities of limited persistence relative to the size of the slope of interest or where the blocks in the rock mass are relatively large compared to the slope of interest.…”
Section: Failure Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The development of the slide-topple mechanism is attributed to the fully persistent nature of the rear release (toppling) discontinuity set which can act as a single column when the rock mass is confined and/ or the block size is small enough relative to the size of the slope. This phenomenon had previously been described by Aydan et al (1989) for base friction physical models with fully persistent discontinuities. These findings therefore suggest that classification schemes such as proposed by Ashby (1971) and toppling nomograms (Choquet and Tanon 1985) should only be applied when investigating the stability of an individual rock block, a rock mass with discontinuities of limited persistence relative to the size of the slope of interest or where the blocks in the rock mass are relatively large compared to the slope of interest.…”
Section: Failure Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The most important parameter in a toppling failure is the point where the inter-column forces act. Some researchers suggested the following assumptions in regards to the determination of the point of action of the inter-column forces (Goodman and Bray 1976;Aydan et al 1989;Aydan and Kawamoto 1992):…”
Section: Mechanism Of Block-flexure Toppling Failurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…c Block-flexure such failures in the form of design charts and computer codes (Hoek and Bray 1977;Zanbak 1983;Choquet and Tanon 1985;Keith Turner and Schuster 1996). After 1986, based on Goodman and Bray's classification, a lot of research was carried out on blocky and flexural toppling failures (Wyllie 1980;Aydan et al 1989;Aydan and Kawamoto 1992;Adhikary et al 1997;Bobet 1999;Sageseta et al 2001;Adhikary and Guo 2002;Amini 2009;Amini el al. 2009;Aydan and Amini 2009;Brideau and Stead 2009;Majdi and Amini 2011).…”
Section: Parameters Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations