1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(98)00048-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effective elastic behavior of some models for perfect cellular solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many analytical models have been proposed for the elastic stiffness of cellular materials, and with each there is associated a specific set of assumptions about the architecture of the foam and appropriate deformation mechanisms [18,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. In summary, for open-cell foams where elastic deformation is dominated by stretching of the beams, the stiffness is a linear function of the relative density.…”
Section: Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many analytical models have been proposed for the elastic stiffness of cellular materials, and with each there is associated a specific set of assumptions about the architecture of the foam and appropriate deformation mechanisms [18,19,[21][22][23][24][25][26]. In summary, for open-cell foams where elastic deformation is dominated by stretching of the beams, the stiffness is a linear function of the relative density.…”
Section: Elastic Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When loaded macroscopically, closed cell materials develop tensile membrane stresses that efficiently utilize material volume independent of the macroscopic loading direction 24 . This stretched material contributes maximally to the macroscopic stiffness 24,11 . The geometric complexity of ordered 3D closed cell materials has historically made their study and utilization impractical, from both an analytical predictive, and a manufacturing standpoint.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ordinate intercepts at zero relative density in FIG.3, which we denote SE, SG, and SK for the plots of ( ̅ ⁄ )/( ̅ ⁄ ), ( ̅ ⁄ )/( ̅ ⁄ ) and ( ̅ ⁄ )/( ̅ ⁄ ) respectively, quantify this volume, being the fractional modulus of an equivalent effective continuum. As relative density increases, 2 nd and 3 rd order contributions, associated with the bending of struts and plates respectively 11 , become significant. In the case of the bulk modulus, the theoretical bounds are sensitive to the Poisson ratio,  of the constituent material.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this figure dashed lines indicate the results for reference structures with flat cell walls, whereas the solid lines give the density dependence of the structures based on the dry foams' geometries. Values for à reported by Grenestedt 3) for flat-celled tetrakaidecahedra structures are given for comparison. They fit very well with the values found for the respective structures in the present investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%