2009
DOI: 10.1080/09712119.2009.9707000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Various Additives and Harvesting Stages on Rumen Degradation of Sunflower Silages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sunflower as a forage source is reported to be high in fiber and low digestibility (Demirel et al 2009) compared to other forages. Forages with high fiber content reduce the digestibility of the ration, the synthesis of rumen microbial protein and the supply of energy (Gottardo et al 2017).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sunflower as a forage source is reported to be high in fiber and low digestibility (Demirel et al 2009) compared to other forages. Forages with high fiber content reduce the digestibility of the ration, the synthesis of rumen microbial protein and the supply of energy (Gottardo et al 2017).…”
Section: Chemical Composition Of Dietsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is medium quality forage due to its high fibre content and lower digestibility resulting in negative effects on intake (Demirel et al, 2006). Ensiling may be difficult due to low dry matter (DM) content that together with a medium protein content does not lower pH rapidly (Demirel et al, 2009). Given its medium quality, the recommended proportion for inclusion of sunflower silage in diets for dairy cows varies among authors, who coincide that, due to its limitations, is not viable as an only source of forage (Tan et al, 2014;Aragadvay-Yungán et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%