2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2016.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of thermal tempering on microstructure and mechanical properties of Mg-AZ31/Al-6061 diffusion bonding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kirkendall voids were formed on the magnesium side, due to the higher coefficient of diffusion of magnesium atoms in aluminum, Figure 6. This is not in accordance with other researchers, who did not observe similar phenomena for diffusion bonding of aluminum and magnesium [27]. Additionally, multitude of precipitates which originate from the aluminum and magnesium alloying are observed at the interface, Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…Kirkendall voids were formed on the magnesium side, due to the higher coefficient of diffusion of magnesium atoms in aluminum, Figure 6. This is not in accordance with other researchers, who did not observe similar phenomena for diffusion bonding of aluminum and magnesium [27]. Additionally, multitude of precipitates which originate from the aluminum and magnesium alloying are observed at the interface, Figure 6.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…EDS spectra results indicated that these fragments obtained from the diffusion layer were Al 3 Mg 2 phase. Jafarian et al 37 demonstrated the brittle IMC, Al 3 Mg 2 and Al 12 Mg 17 , were generated in the bonding interface and that the micro-hardness of Al 3 Mg 2 was obviously higher than that of its Al 12 Mg 17 counterpart. This is implied that Al 3 Mg 2 layer is deemed to play the part of the origin of interface delamination and the zone of crack initiation.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Composite Platesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the bonding of Al and Mg alloys is not possible by classical welding methods because of unexpected phase formation in the joint area. Among solid-state welding techniques for joining such alloys, the following processes could be cited: friction welding, explosive welding, transient liquid phase bonding and diffusion bonding [5][6][7] . Friction-stir welding [8][9][10][11][12] of Mg-Al can achieve relatively high joining strength comparing other methods, but for the direct contact of base Mg and Al, there are also Mg-Al intermetallic compounds in the joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also confirmed that the solidified droplets melted at 436 and 449 ℃ by differential scanning calorimetry, nearly identical to the eutectic temperatures. Many experimental studies have been done for diffusion bonding 4,5,14,15) . The outstanding process parameters in diffusion bonding are: bonding temperature, bonding pressure, holding time and surface roughness of the alloys to be joined It has been found that bonding temperature has a greater influence on shear strength and bonding strength of the joints followed by bonding pressure, holding time, and surface roughness 14) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%