2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2016.11.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of the growth conditions on the anisotropy, domain structures and the relaxation in Co thin films

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CoFeB target is at an angle of 30° with respect to the substrate normal due to the in-built geometry of the deposition system. Such an oblique-angle deposition-induced uniaxial anisotropy has been reported earlier. , It should be noticed that there is a change in the coercive field ( H C ) in the bilayer samples as compared to the single-layer reference sample. The values of H C are 1.23, 0.71, 0.91, and 0.81 mT for samples S1, S2, S4, and S5, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The CoFeB target is at an angle of 30° with respect to the substrate normal due to the in-built geometry of the deposition system. Such an oblique-angle deposition-induced uniaxial anisotropy has been reported earlier. , It should be noticed that there is a change in the coercive field ( H C ) in the bilayer samples as compared to the single-layer reference sample. The values of H C are 1.23, 0.71, 0.91, and 0.81 mT for samples S1, S2, S4, and S5, respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The mean grey scale intensity of domain images is plotted with respect to its corresponding time to obtain the relaxation curve. Similar relaxation study have been previously described using single and double exponential decay behavior in case of both continuous thin films and MAL arrays with in-plane anisotropy 9 11 , 28 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…In order to facilitate the observation, we only give the atomic distribution at the interface. 35,36 In order to investigate the stability of (001) SrHfO 3 /GaAs interface, we also calculate the interface binding energy, which is defined as 37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference is mainly due to different film growth mechanisms. 35,36 In order to investigate the stability of (001) SrHfO 3 /GaAs interface, we also calculate the interface binding energy, which is defined as 37…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%