1991
DOI: 10.1252/jcej.24.177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of solution environment on unstirred dead-end ultrafiltration characteristics of proteinaceous solutions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While membrane filtration is a key process which has the widespread application, it is generally recognized that one of the major drawbacks to more widespread use of membrane filtration is a significant increase in the filtration resistance known as membrane fouling, resulting in a dramatic flux decline over time under constant pressure conditions or a remarkable pressure rise over time under constant rate conditions. The membrane fouling is affected by several factors, e.g., pore blocking and/or pore constriction Bredée, 1935, 1936;Grace, 1956;Shirato et al, 1979;Hermia, 1982;Iritani et al, 1992Iritani et al, , 2009Iritani et al, , 2013, cake formation (Reihanian et al, 1983;Chudacek and Fane, 1984;Iritani et al, 1991aIritani et al, , 2014aNakakura et al, 1997;Mohammadi et al, 2005;Thekkedath et al, 2007;Sarkar, 2013;Salinas-Rodriguez et al, 2015), solute adsorption (Fane et al, 1983;Iritani et al, 1994), and concentration polarization (Kimura and Sourirajan, 1967;Vilker et al, 1981). Initially, foulants smaller than the pore size of membrane deposit or adsorb onto the pore walls, thereby leading to the pore constriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While membrane filtration is a key process which has the widespread application, it is generally recognized that one of the major drawbacks to more widespread use of membrane filtration is a significant increase in the filtration resistance known as membrane fouling, resulting in a dramatic flux decline over time under constant pressure conditions or a remarkable pressure rise over time under constant rate conditions. The membrane fouling is affected by several factors, e.g., pore blocking and/or pore constriction Bredée, 1935, 1936;Grace, 1956;Shirato et al, 1979;Hermia, 1982;Iritani et al, 1992Iritani et al, , 2009Iritani et al, , 2013, cake formation (Reihanian et al, 1983;Chudacek and Fane, 1984;Iritani et al, 1991aIritani et al, , 2014aNakakura et al, 1997;Mohammadi et al, 2005;Thekkedath et al, 2007;Sarkar, 2013;Salinas-Rodriguez et al, 2015), solute adsorption (Fane et al, 1983;Iritani et al, 1994), and concentration polarization (Kimura and Sourirajan, 1967;Vilker et al, 1981). Initially, foulants smaller than the pore size of membrane deposit or adsorb onto the pore walls, thereby leading to the pore constriction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) and (16) where e av,ω is the average void ratio from the membrane surface to the distance w from the membrane. The thickness L of the protein filter cake is expressed based on the material balance as L҃ v (18) As shown in the figure, high specific filtration resistance can be obtained although the porosity in the cake is not so small [2,17]. The figure obviously demonstrates that both p s and a decrease with the distance x.…”
Section: Compressible Cake Filtration Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is apparent that a around the isoelectric point is much smaller than that at pH 7 with the same solution concentration. On the other hand, the average specific filtration resistance a av of the cake in the ultrafiltration of BSA solutions reaches a definite maximum around the isoelectric point [2]. In order to account for this discrepancy, a high-speed sedimentation equilibrium experiment was conducted.…”
Section: Analysis Of Ultrafiltration Behaviors Based On Ultracentrifumentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations