2019
DOI: 10.1080/13621718.2019.1661116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of simulated cooling time on microstructure and toughness of CGHAZ in novel high-strength low-carbon construction steel

Abstract: Influences of cooling time (welding heat input) on microstructure, impact toughness and the fracture mechanism of the weakest CGHAZ (coarse-grained heat-affected zone) in a novel highstrength low-carbon microalloyed construction steel were studied for the purpose of laying a theoretical foundation for developing welding support technologies. When the cooling time (t 8/5 ) was increased, the microstructure changed from dot shape M-A constituents and lath martensite/bainite to slender and blocky M-A constituents… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The research shows that the frequent diversions of cracks during the propagation tend to increase the crack propagation absorbed energy. [ 36 ] In addition, the stage from the brittle fracture initiation load (i.e., F f ) to the brittle fracture arrested load (i.e., F a ) corresponds the stage of the brittle propagation. The ratio of F a to F f in 20Mn2SiCr specimen (≈0.38) is greater than that in 23CrNi3Mo specimen (≈0.23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research shows that the frequent diversions of cracks during the propagation tend to increase the crack propagation absorbed energy. [ 36 ] In addition, the stage from the brittle fracture initiation load (i.e., F f ) to the brittle fracture arrested load (i.e., F a ) corresponds the stage of the brittle propagation. The ratio of F a to F f in 20Mn2SiCr specimen (≈0.38) is greater than that in 23CrNi3Mo specimen (≈0.23).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of M/A islands is a key factor for the microcracks formation induced by M/A islands (Moeinifar et al, 2011;Jorge et al, 2021). With the increase in the size of M/A islands, the exerted load for inducing the microcrack is decreased (Lan et al, 2014;Qin et al, 2019;Cui et al, 2020). On the other hand, the literatures (Li et al, 2011;Lan et al, 2012;Li et al, 2015) documented that fine-sized M/A islands do not impair the toughness of metal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of M/A islands is a key factor for the microcracks formation induced by M/A islands [31,32]. With the increase in the size of M/A islands, the exerted load for inducing the microcrack is decreased [33][34][35]. On the other hand, the literature [36][37][38] documented that fine-sized M/A islands did not impair the toughness of metal.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%