BACKGROUNDThe Japanese Diabetes Society has released an algorithm for pharmacotherapy for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). 1 It recommends metformin and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for patients with obesity. However, there is insufficient evidence to show which patients are more suitable for SGLT2 inhibitors or metformin among patients undergoing primary prevention.Visceral adipose tissue, accurately measured using computed tomography (CT), is an independent risk marker of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, while visceral fat reduction ameliorates metabolic disorders. 2 Some studies reported that SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced visceral fat area (VFA) 3 and metformin reduced visceral fat. 4 We previously reported that the mean percentage reduction in the VFA was significantly greater in the ipragliflozin, an SGLT2 inhibitor, group than in the metformin group. 5 Therefore, a sub-analysis of a prospective, multicenter, blinded-endpoint, randomized controlled study 5 was conducted to identify responders to ipragliflozin and metformin in reducing VFA in patients with T2D. We analysed patient backgrounds between high-reduction responders and low-reduction non-responders, identifying contributing clinical factors.
| METHODSThis main study evaluated the efficacy of treatment with ipragliflozin or metformin in reducing VFA in 103 patients with T2D. The study design has been previously described. 6 The study protocol was approved by the relevant ethics committees and conformed to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Participants who provided written informed consent were registered between September 2014 and September 2016. The study was registered at http:// www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/, with registration ID UMIN-ID: UMIN 000015170.Patients with T2D with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥22 kg/m 2 and a glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of ≥7% and <10% were included. The patients were randomized to receive ipragliflozin (50 mg/day) or metformin (1000-1500 mg/day). The primary outcome was the percentage change in the VFA measured using CT after 24 weeks of therapy. Two radiologists blinded to the information analysed the images. The secondary outcomes included changes in subcutaneous fat area; abdominal muscle volume measured using CT; body weight; BMI; waist circumference; HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, triglyceride, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, urinary