1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2396(199704)25:4<321::aid-syn2>3.0.co;2-c
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
Effect of reserpine-induced depletion of synaptic dopamine on [11C]Raclopride binding to D2-dopamine receptors in the monkey brain
Abstract: Positron emission tomography was used to examine the in vivo binding of [11C]raclopride to D2-dopamine (DA) receptors in the striatum of two Cynomolgus monkeys after a single dose of reserpine (1 mg/kg, i.v.). A Scatchard procedure was repeated five times to follow D2 receptor density and apparent affinity for 7 weeks after reserpine. Reserpine-induced depletion of DA lead to a marked increase in [11C]raclopride binding, which was still detectable 20 days after treatment. Scatchard analyses indicated that the …
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
85
9
6
1
Citation Types
1
29
1
0
Year Published
1997
2026
Publication Types
Select...
87
8
1
1
Relationship
10
87
Authors
Journals
Cited by 97 publications
(31 citation statements)
References 26 publications
1
29
1
0
“…However, the partial dopamine depletion increased the availability of D 2 antagonist binding sites by less than 20%, even in the schizophrenic subjects. In contrast, the present study and earlier results in experimental animals3,19,24 indicate basal occupancy of antagonist bindings sites of about 40%. Since complete dopamine depletions are not obtained in human PET studies, differences in p B could be attributed to differential lability of the extacellular dopamine in addition to differences in basal occupancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…However, the partial dopamine depletion increased the availability of D 2 antagonist binding sites by less than 20%, even in the schizophrenic subjects. In contrast, the present study and earlier results in experimental animals3,19,24 indicate basal occupancy of antagonist bindings sites of about 40%. Since complete dopamine depletions are not obtained in human PET studies, differences in p B could be attributed to differential lability of the extacellular dopamine in addition to differences in basal occupancy.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in agreement with previous reports conducted in reserpine-treated animals repeatedly administered with cocaine, in which alterations of the in vivo binding for both D 1 and D 2 receptors were attributable to apparent modifications of the affinity and not the number of binding sites (Tsukada et al, 1996;Ginovart et al, 1997). An acute challenge with amphetamine, conversely, appears to result in a different type of response that might be mediated by changes in receptors available for ligand binding (Sun et al, 2003;Chefer et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…First, not all radioligands show this effect. Although benzamide radioligands (such as raclopride, IBZM, fallypride, clebopride) are always affected by endogenous DA in a manner consistent with the model (Innis et al, 1992;Volkow et al, 1994;Laruelle et al, 1995;Ginovart et al, 1997;Hartvig et al, 1997;Mach et al, 1997;Mukherjee et al, 1997), in vivo and ex vivo binding of butyrophenone compounds (such as spiperone, NMSP, pimozide) to D 2 -receptors show either no change or changes in the direction opposite that expected (Niehoff et al, 1979;Saelens et al, 1980;Bischoff et al, 1991;Onoe et al, 1994;Kobayashi et al, 1995). Second, the amphetamineinduced changes in […”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
