1996
DOI: 10.1109/50.541231
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of relatively strong light injection on the chirp-to-power ratio and the 3 dB bandwidth of directly modulated semiconductor lasers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be mentioned, however, that a great care must be taken when modulating a laser under relatively strong light injection. As shown in [18], only a part of the total locking range is dynamically stable. To operate the laser in this range and avoid an eventually severe instability, a suitable choice of the parameter values is necessary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be mentioned, however, that a great care must be taken when modulating a laser under relatively strong light injection. As shown in [18], only a part of the total locking range is dynamically stable. To operate the laser in this range and avoid an eventually severe instability, a suitable choice of the parameter values is necessary.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under light injection, other interesting phenomena, such as locked or unstable regimes may be observed with different operating conditions. Locking occurs when the optical frequency of the injected light is chosen within the so-called locking range [17], [18]. This is the range over which the frequency of the slave laser can be tuned while still locked to the master laser frequency.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laser frequency chirp can be reduced as the wavelength of the modulated laser is injection-locked. The corresponding phase θ of the laser under light injection is given by [8]:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The form we used for our free running laser was very similar to those used before normalisation by Le Bihan and Yabre in [15]. In [16] Yabre neglects the gain compression factor, ε, by assuming that the optical power is moderate enough to allow the approximation (εS << 1) and hence (1-εS) ≈ 1.…”
Section: Matlab Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%