Effect of reducing the number of items of the Oral Health Impact Profile on responsiveness, validity and reliability in edentulous populations

Awad, Manal A.; Al-Shamrany, Muneera; Locker, David; Allen, Finbarr; Feine, Jocelyne S.

doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2006.00364.x

Cited by 33 publications

(35 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, using its short version (OHIP-14) decreased its reliability and validity in edentulous patients. 51 Furthermore, it is complex and may confuse patients due to its psychological evaluation. The dental impact on daily living (DIDL) test is a sociodental instrument and was used in this study because unlike other sociodental indicators, it assesses the dental impact on daily living, the relative importance that respondents attribute to each dimension and oral status.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between Impacts of Complete Denture Treatment on Daily Living, Satisfaction and Personality Profiles

Hantash

AL‐Omiri²,

Yunis³

et al. 2011

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To investigate the association between satisfaction with conventional complete denture prostheses (CDs), impacts of CDs on daily living and personality profiles. Materials and methods:Fifty-six patients (28 males and 28 females; mean age 53.79 ± 7.762 years) with fitted upper and lower removable CDs were recruited for this study. Clinical success of CDs was assessed according to specific clinical criteria. The dental impact on daily living questionnaire (DIDL) was used to measure satisfaction with CDs and their impacts on daily living. NEO five factor inventory (NEO -FFI) was used to measure patients' personality profiles. Pearson correlation test and regression models were used to analyze the collected data.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Relationship between Impacts of Complete Denture Treatment on Daily Living, Satisfaction and Personality Profiles

Hantash

AL‐Omiri²,

Yunis³

et al. 2011

The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As regards some of the scale dimensions, an α coefficient under 0.70 also occurred in the validation of short versions of the OHIP that used this evaluation methodology 10,12 and in the original description of the instrument 4 . This can be justified by the smaller number of items in the short instruments 24 . The moderate correlation among the scale items is desirable, because it reveals colinearity between them.…”

Section: Subscalesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the OHIP-14 and prevalence and severity of oral health impacts in a rural riverine population in Amazonas State, Brazil

et al. 2010

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objectives of this study were: (1) test the psychometric properties of OHIP-14 in a rural population; and (2) compare the oral health impacts in two riverine communities in the Brazilian Amazon that were living at different distances from an urban center. Data were obtained from a cross-sectional study in a consecutive sample (n = 126). The validity was assessed through the association of OHIP with clinical and subjective variables, which showed a more significant association with: pain, caries, need of extraction or endodontic treatment; than with tooth loss, periodontal disease or need of prostheses. The stability and internal consistency were good (ICC = 0.97; Cronbach's α = 0.89). The prevalence of oral impacts was greater in the community far from the urban center [70.3 (59.9-80.7)] than in the community closer to it [44.3 (30.7-57.7)], and in women [66.7 (56.0-77.3)] in comparison with men [49.1 (35.3-62.7)]. The OHIP-14 adapted to rural populations in Amazonas State was valid, reproducible, and consistent. There was high prevalence of impacts, especially for riverine communities that lived far from urban centers.

show abstract

“…Despite its wide acceptance, proven reliability and strong validity, the large number of items included in this instrument may limit its use in clinical trials, clinical practice and surveys (8). When choosing measurement scales to evaluate the OHRQoL in the elderly, short questionnaires seem to have more advantages (9).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health-related quality of life in complete denture wearers depending on their socio-demographic background, prosthetic-related factors and clinical condition

Perea¹,

Suárez-García²,

Río³

et al. 2013

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: To investigate the differences in impact on oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) among complete denture wearers depending on their socio-demographic characteristics, prosthetic-related factors and oral status. Study Design: 51 patients aged 50-90 years treated, from 2005 to 2010, with at least one complete denture at the Department of Buccofacial Prostheses of the Complutense University (Madrid) were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. All of the participants answered the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14sp) questionnaire. The additive scoring method was used. The prevalence of impacts was calculated by using the occasional threshold (OHIP-14sp score≥2). Socio-demographic and prosthetic-related variables were gathered. Patients underwent clinical examination to assess their oral condition. Descriptive probes and Chi-Square tests were run (p≤0.05). Results: The predominant participants’ profile was that of a man with a mean age of 69 years wearing complete dentures in both the maxilla and the mandible. The prevalence of impact was 23.5%, showing an average score of 19±9.8. The most affected domains were “functional limitation” and “physical pain”, followed by “physical disability”. Minor impacts were recorded for the psychological and social subscales (“psychological discomfort”, “psychological disability”, “social disability” and “handicap”). The prosthesis’ location significantly influenced the overall patient satisfaction, the lower dentures being the less comfortable. Having a complete removable denture as antagonist significantly hampered the patient satisfaction. Patients without prosthetic stomatitis and those who need repairing or changing their prostheses, recorded significantly higher OHIP-14sp total scores. Conclusions: The use of conventional complete dentures brings negative impacts in the OHRQoL of elderly patients, mainly in case of lower prostheses that required reparation or substitution, with a removable total denture as antagonist. The prosthetic stomatitis in this study was always associated to other severe illness, which may have influenced the self-perceived discomfort with the prostheses, as those patients were daily medicated with painkillers. Key words:Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP), oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL), patient satisfaction, complete denture, elderly patients.

show abstract

Effect of reducing the number of items of the Oral Health Impact Profile on responsiveness, validity and reliability in edentulous populations

Abstract: The results indicate that although the 49-item OHIP responsiveness could be maintained with item reduction, this will lead to compromises in reliability and validity.

Cited by 33 publications

References 20 publications

Relationship between Impacts of Complete Denture Treatment on Daily Living, Satisfaction and Personality Profiles

Relationship between Impacts of Complete Denture Treatment on Daily Living, Satisfaction and Personality Profiles

Psychometric properties of the OHIP-14 and prevalence and severity of oral health impacts in a rural riverine population in Amazonas State, Brazil

Oral health-related quality of life in complete denture wearers depending on their socio-demographic background, prosthetic-related factors and clinical condition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About