2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0963-8695(00)00073-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of prestraining on Barkhausen noise vs. stress relation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
2
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
32
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The larger scattering of the points for samples in HR condition led to a lower R value. This may be caused by microstructural variations along the HR samples due to the straightening process, and was similarly seen in Figure 3 and verified by 20 in a study about the influence of pre-strain stress in MBN residual stress analysis. Such an effect is not seen in GR samples because these variations have been made more homogeneous with the heat treatments and, especially, the surface finishing process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The larger scattering of the points for samples in HR condition led to a lower R value. This may be caused by microstructural variations along the HR samples due to the straightening process, and was similarly seen in Figure 3 and verified by 20 in a study about the influence of pre-strain stress in MBN residual stress analysis. Such an effect is not seen in GR samples because these variations have been made more homogeneous with the heat treatments and, especially, the surface finishing process.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 69%
“…It is mainly because the magnitude of MBN signal will be influenced by the stress field at tested region, plastic deformation, grain orientation and varieties of inhomogeneous factors, which enables the relationship between MBN signal and stress not to be calibrated as shown in the work by Jagadish et al(1990). Additionally the limited power spectrum of MBN will confine its testing depth suggested in previous work by the authors (Jiles, 1996;Lindgren and Lepisto, 2001). …”
Section: Theory and Methods Of Magnetic Barkhausen Noisementioning
confidence: 97%
“…The magnetic moments distribute randomly in the initial state and no magnetization appears. When an external load is applied to a ferromagnetic specimen, a tension tends to orient the domains in the direction of the applied load for a positive magnetostrictive material and a compression orients the domains perpendicularly to the loading direction due to the piezomagnetic effect [23], as shown in Fig. 7.…”
Section: Figure 6 the Formation And Expansion Of The Lüders Bandsmentioning
confidence: 99%