2015
DOI: 10.1007/s13204-015-0509-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of preparation conditions on the nanostructure of hydroxyapatite and brushite phases

Abstract: Hydroxyapatite (HAP) and dicalcium phosphate dihydrate (brushite) nanoparticles were prepared by co-precipitation method. The obtained products were characterized by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD), Fourier transformation infra-red spectroscopy (FTIR) and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) were used to investigate the morphology of the powdered samples as well as their microstructure, respectively. Brushite samples were obtained in a s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(46 reference statements)
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reduction in theoretical density calculated by x-ray diffraction means that the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell tends to be loose and irregular, and the interaction between the atoms is weakened, the reduction in density indicates less stability. This is consistent with the result that the x-ray diffraction peaks broadened and shifted [14][15][16][17]. Quantitative experiments were further conducted for structural analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reduction in theoretical density calculated by x-ray diffraction means that the arrangement of atoms in the unit cell tends to be loose and irregular, and the interaction between the atoms is weakened, the reduction in density indicates less stability. This is consistent with the result that the x-ray diffraction peaks broadened and shifted [14][15][16][17]. Quantitative experiments were further conducted for structural analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…-CO 3 2 -containing BCP and pure BCP from fish bone To measure the phase composition and crystal structure of the inorganic components in the prepared materials, slow-scan fullname (XRD) (D8 ADVANCE, Germany) was used to determine the exact peak positions, and the working conditions were as follows: Cu-Kα as the radiation source and scanning at a step of 0.03°and a rate of 4°/min in the angular range of 10-60°. Using SGI workstation Ccrius2 (version 4.2) software package of American MSI Corporation and DWBS941l software to refine the powder XRD analysis data of the two samples by Rietveld refinement, the unit cell parameters of the two groups of samples were obtained and the unit cell structure integrity was compared, both samples have a two-phase structure, the theoretical density was determined using the formula = Dx ZM NV (where M is the molecular weight of the sample, N is Avogadro's number, Z is the number of molecules per unit cell and V is the unit cell volume) calculate the density of each single phase of each sample, and then calculate the calculated density of the two samples according to the formula = + Dx AD BD x x 1 2 (where A, B are the relative contribution ratios of the existing crystalline phases) [14][15][16][17]. The molecular functional groups of the sample, especially the -CO 3 2 vibration, were analyzed by fullname (FTIR) spectroscopy (1750, Perkin-Elmer, USA).…”
Section: The Characterization Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bone’s apatite is not a pure HAP; it is naturally doped with different elements and concentrations 3 . Synthesized HAP is distinguished by its good biocompatibility, osteoconductivity and bone-attachment ability but its brittleness, rigidity and high degradation rate have limited HAP from being used in the broad spectrum of biomedical applications 4 5 6 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical density (Dx) was calculated from XRD data using the following formula : Dx=ZM/NV where Z : the number of molecules per unit cell, M : the molecular weight of the sample, N : Avogadro's number, and V the unit cell volume calculated from XRD data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%