Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related behaviour change: evidence from the Food4me European randomized controlled trial

Celis‐Morales, Carlos; Livingstone, Katherine M.; Marsaux, Cyril F. M.; Macready, Anna L.; Fallaize, Rosalind; O'Donovan, C.B.; Woolhead, Clara; Forster, Hannah; Walsh, Marianne C.; Navas‐Carretero, Santiago; San-Cristóbal, Rodrigo; Tsirigoti, Lydia; Lambrinou, Christina P.; Mavrogianni, Christina; Moschonis, George; Kolossa, Silvia; Hallmann, Jacqueline; Godlewska, Magdalena; Surwiłło, Agnieszka; Traczyk, Iwona; Drevon, Christian A.; Bouwman, Jildau; Ommen, Ben van; Grimaldi, Keith; Parnell, Laurence D.; Matthews, J. N. S.; Μanios, Yannis; Daniel, Hannelore; Martínez, J. Alfredo; Lovegrove, Julie A.; Gibney, Eileen R.; Brennan, Lorraine; Saris, Wim H. M.; Gibney, Mike; Mathers, John C.

doi:10.1093/ije/dyw186

Cited by 245 publications

(344 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

318

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…A pesar de que el tipo de información otorgada por la ENS 2009-10 no permite establecer relación causa-efecto, sin duda estos hallazgos podrían ser de gran utilidad para definir y aplicar intervenciones efectivas orientadas a disminuir el sedentarismo, sobre todo en grupos vulnerables. Si bien las intervenciones generalizadas tienen un efecto limitado en modificar el estilo de vida de la población 31,32 , intervenciones más personalizadas, diseñadas para individuos con mayor riesgo de ser altamente sedentarios, podrían ser efectivas para reducir los niveles de sedentarismo [33][34][35][36] . Por ejemplo, para el caso de personas con ingresos económicos más altos, y que poseen mayor nivel educacional, las alternativas más eficaces podrían ser la inclusión de pausas activas en el trabajo y el transporte activo.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Factores asociados a sedentarismo en Chile: evidencia de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionunclassified

Factores asociados a sedentarismo en Chile: evidencia de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…El grupo de referencia utilizado para cada variable se señala con (Ref.). física en forma cotidiana [22][23][24][25] . Nuestros resultados también muestran que personas con mayor nivel educacional y aquellos que reportaron mayor consumo de frutas y verduras presentan un menor odds de ser físicamente inactivos.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Factores asociados a inactividad física en Chile: resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

et al. 2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…More specifically, those in the personalised groups, consumed significantly less red meat (−5·48 g (95 % CI −10·8, −0·09), P = 0·046), salt (−0·65 g (95% CI −1·1, −0·25), P = 0·002) and saturated fat (−1·14 % of energy (95% CI −1·6, −0·67), P < 0·0001) (36) . Furthermore, levels 1, 2 and 3 personalised groups significantly increased their folate intake and had higher Healthy Eating Index scores, than those in the control group.…”

Section: Recent Findings In Personalised Nutritionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Knowing your genes: does this impact behaviour change?

et al. 2017

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is postulated that knowledge of genotype may be more powerful than other types of personalised information in terms of motivating behaviour change. However, there is also a danger that disclosure of genetic risk may promote a fatalistic attitude and demotivate individuals. The original concept of personalised nutrition (PN) focused on genotype-based tailored dietary advice; however, PN can also be delivered based on assessment of dietary intake and phenotypic measures. Whilst dietitians currently provide PN advice based on diet and phenotype, genotype-based PN advice is not so readily available. The aim of this review is to examine the evidence for genotype-based personalised information on motivating behaviour change, and factors which may affect the impact of genotype-based personalised advice. Recent findings in PN will also be discussed, with respect to a large European study, Food4Me, which investigated the impact of varying levels of PN advice on motivating behaviour change. The researchers reported that PN advice resulted in greater dietary changes compared with general healthy eating advice, but no additional benefit was observed for PN advice based on phenotype and genotype information. Within Food4Me, work from our group revealed that knowledge of MTHFR genotype did not significantly improve intakes of dietary folate. In general, evidence is weak with regard to genotype-based PN advice. For future work, studies should test the impact of PN advice developed on a strong nutrigenetic evidence base, ensure an appropriate study design for the research question asked, and incorporate behaviour change techniques into the intervention.

show abstract

Effect of personalized nutrition on health-related behaviour change: evidence from the Food4me European randomized controlled trial

Abstract: Background -Optimal nutritional choices are linked with better health but many current

Cited by 245 publications

References 22 publications

Factores asociados a sedentarismo en Chile: evidencia de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

Factores asociados a sedentarismo en Chile: evidencia de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

Factores asociados a inactividad física en Chile: resultados de la Encuesta Nacional de Salud 2009-2010

Knowing your genes: does this impact behaviour change?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About