2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of personalized external aortic root support on aortic root motion and distension in Marfan syndrome patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Repair group : Table 2 and Figure 6 show that the repair group presented smaller and more homogeneous displacements and rotations than the other groups. These findings are consistent with previous studies [ 17 ], indicative of the higher graft stiffness relative to the native aortic tissue [ 18 , 19 ]. Distensibility was also lowest in the repair group, an expected finding given the very stiff properties of synthetic fabric vascular grafts [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Repair group : Table 2 and Figure 6 show that the repair group presented smaller and more homogeneous displacements and rotations than the other groups. These findings are consistent with previous studies [ 17 ], indicative of the higher graft stiffness relative to the native aortic tissue [ 18 , 19 ]. Distensibility was also lowest in the repair group, an expected finding given the very stiff properties of synthetic fabric vascular grafts [ 20 , 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Increase in size is the biggest risk for dissection; PEARS holds the aorta with no further enlargement, so the principal calculable risk is obviated [16]. At the point where the intimal tear is characteristically seen, the aortic wall stress is ameliorated [26]. Drug trials of losartan have thus far failed to halt the progression of root dilatation [27].…”
Section: The Aorta Is Still There and May Dissectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Systolic downward aortic root motion and aortic root distension before the operation and in the latest follow-up were measured randomly and blindly after a median follow-up of 50 months (IQR 26-72) following implantation of PEARS. Systolic downward motion of the aortic root was significantly decreased (12.6 ± 3.6 mm pre-operation vs. 7.9 ± 2.9 mm latest followup, p<0.00001) [33] (Figures 12 and 13).…”
Section: Aortic Wall Stress By Mrimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In a subsequent study, the zerodisplacement constraint at the aortic root was replaced with a systolic downward aortic root motion which revealed the PEARS significantly reduced the maximum longitudinal stress in the ascending aorta (Figure 12). The point of maximum stress and therefore greatest change was in the first few centimetres of the ascending aorta, the site at which the intimal tear of aortic dissection was most likely to occur [33].…”
Section: Aortic Wall Stress By Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%