2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.116865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of oxidation degree of GO nanosheets on microstructure and performance of polysulfone-GO mixed matrix membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Membrane fouling resulted in a decrease in water flux in all the membranes for pure water and contaminated water, which is clearly shown in Figure 2 . Similar trends were reported in previous studies [ 31 , 32 ]. As shown in Figure 2 , the antifouling behaviour of the membranes was determined, and FRR, R t , R ir, and R r were calculated using Equations (1)–(4), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Membrane fouling resulted in a decrease in water flux in all the membranes for pure water and contaminated water, which is clearly shown in Figure 2 . Similar trends were reported in previous studies [ 31 , 32 ]. As shown in Figure 2 , the antifouling behaviour of the membranes was determined, and FRR, R t , R ir, and R r were calculated using Equations (1)–(4), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…No significant pressure effect was observed on the FRR of the pristine PSF membrane (P) for pure water, as it was reported to be constantly 0.41 with the pressure change from 2.5 to 6.25 bars, whereas the FRR value increased with the increase in pressure for CP and MCP. The mixed-matrix PSF membranes showed a higher % FRR than the pristine PSF membranes at 6.25 bars due to the presence of composite particles on the PSF matrix, as ZnO and GO enhance the antifouling activity of membranes [ 32 , 33 , 34 ]. Between the two mixed-matrix PSF membranes CP and MCP, MCP had an FRR of 0.78, which was higher than CP (0.57) at 6.25 bar due to the presence of iron oxide in the composite particles in addition to GO and ZnO; iron oxide enhanced the membrane’s hydrophilicity and antifouling activity [ 35 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isoelectric point (the pH value where no charge is present at the surface) was used to define the changes in the membrane surface charge due to the GO and ZnO addition to the fiber matrix. The surface zeta potential of the synthesized membranes as a function of pH value is shown in Figure 10 ; the values support the previously reported results [ 80 ]. The polymer electrospun membrane P, where no filler materials were added, has an isoelectric point of 2.6.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The increasing formation of amide and –COOH groups in the PA layer ( Figure 4 and Figure 5 ) influences the strength and repeated axes of the hydrogen bonds [ 43 ]. Zhang et al [ 44 ] reported that the close interactions between water and the hydrophilic functional group in the PA layer improves the adsorption capacity of the membrane surface and could enhance the transport of water molecules through the membrane.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%