2016
DOI: 10.1080/02571862.2016.1148788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of integrated soil bunds on key soil properties and soil carbon stock in semi-arid areas of northern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
4
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Total porosity was showed a signi cant difference between stone-faced soil bund stabilized with kidan grass and other conservation measures. Similarly, Tadesse et al (2016) stated that integrating bunds with forage species was a better option to improve soil properties than bunds alone. Soil pH, organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total porosity was showed a signi cant difference between stone-faced soil bund stabilized with kidan grass and other conservation measures. Similarly, Tadesse et al (2016) stated that integrating bunds with forage species was a better option to improve soil properties than bunds alone. Soil pH, organic carbon, and cation exchange capacity…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, soil and water conservation practices and planting nitrogen-fixing tree species contribute to increased SOM content. Tadesse et al [41] also reported the increased soil organic carbon content with the planting of forage tree species and conservation.…”
Section: Relationships Among the Soil Chemical And Physical Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The model‐based nutrient losses through erosion in this study except N losses in Alaje were similar to a study conducted in the central highlands of Ethiopia by Adimassu, Mekonnen, Yirga, and Kessler (2014) who reported measured nutrient losses of 8.2 kg N ha −1 , 0.76 kg P ha −1 and 1.71 kg K ha −1 at the catchment level. This model‐based nutrient losses through erosion were also similar to several findings who reported measured nutrient losses of 12.8 kg N ha −1 , 0.1 kg P ha −1 and 1.7 kg N ha −1 at catchment level in northern Ethiopia (Gebremedhin, Gebresamual, Abadi, Teka, & Mesfin, 2017; Lema, Kebede, Mesfin, Fitiwy, & Abraha, 2016; Lema et al., 2019; Lemma et al., 2017; Mesfin, Taye, Desta, et al, 2018; Mesfin, Taye, & Hailemariam, 2018b; Phong, Stoorvogel, Mensvoort, & Van Udo, 2010; Tadesse, Mesfin, Tesfay, & Abay, 2016). The reason for higher N nutrient losses per unit area in the agricultural lands than at the degraded catchment level can be due to the fact that agricultural lands may have received relatively better inorganic and organic nutrient inputs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%