2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0102-09352012000100021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of inactive dry yeast from sugar cane as protein source on rumen fermentation in Saanen goats

Abstract: Effect of inactive dry yeast from sugar cane as protein source on rumen fermentation in Saanen goats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly to these results, when castrated Saanen goats were fed portions of dry yeast (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%) instead of soybean meal, differences in dry matter and nutrient digestibility were not observed (LIMA et al, 2012b). However, the digestibility of dry matter and nutrients can be improved when dry yeast is included in diets for heifers and goat kids, as reported by Martins et al (2000) and Lima et al (2011), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly to these results, when castrated Saanen goats were fed portions of dry yeast (0, 25, 50, 75 and 100%) instead of soybean meal, differences in dry matter and nutrient digestibility were not observed (LIMA et al, 2012b). However, the digestibility of dry matter and nutrients can be improved when dry yeast is included in diets for heifers and goat kids, as reported by Martins et al (2000) and Lima et al (2011), respectively.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Also, no difference was observed in total digestible nutrients, when soybean meal was replaced by dry yeast (LIMA et al, 2012b). These results may be related mainly to the similar digestibility of crude protein and total carbohydrates observed among the diets (Table 4).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is specified that with the usage of IYM additive, more benefit can be provided from organic indigestible carbohydrate and other organic/inorganic factors, improvement on the digestive levels of feed would be observed (Grochowska et al 2012, Rufino et al 2013. It is also specified that limited feeding, roughage: concentrate feed ratio and feed consumption, intensity of anaerobic and cellulolytic bacteria are effective factors; and in connection the digestibility of cellulose increases (Lima et al 2012). Some researchers associated the effects of IYM with the low-quality roughage containing high CL in ration (Elseed and Abusamra 2007, Tang et al 2008, Tripathi and Karim 2011Turkmen et al 2011, Zain et al 2011.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%