Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on Clinical Status at 14 Days in Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19

Abstract

IMPORTANCE Data on the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 are needed. OBJECTIVE To determine whether hydroxychloroquine is an efficacious treatment for adults hospitalized with COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis was a multicenter, blinded, placebo-controlled randomized trial conducted at 34 hospitals in the US. Adults hospitalized with respiratory symptoms from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection were enrolled between April 2 and June 19, 2020, with the last outcome assessment on July 17, 2020. The planned sample size was 510 patients, with interim analyses planned after every 102 patients were enrolled. The trial was stopped at the fourth interim analysis for futility with a sample size of 479 patients.INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomly assigned to hydroxychloroquine (400 mg twice daily for 2 doses, then 200 mg twice daily for 8 doses) (n = 242) or placebo (n = 237). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESThe primary outcome was clinical status 14 days after randomization as assessed with a 7-category ordinal scale ranging from 1 (death) to 7 (discharged from the hospital and able to perform normal activities). The primary outcome was analyzed with a multivariable proportional odds model, with an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) greater than 1.0 indicating more favorable outcomes with hydroxychloroquine than placebo. The trial included 12 secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality. RESULTS Among 479 patients who were randomized (median age, 57 years; 44.3% female; 37.2% Hispanic/Latinx; 23.4% Black; 20.1% in the intensive care unit; 46.8% receiving supplemental oxygen without positive pressure; 11.5% receiving noninvasive ventilation or nasal high-flow oxygen; and 6.7% receiving invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), 433 (90.4%) completed the primary outcome assessment at 14 days and the remainder had clinical status imputed. The median duration of symptoms prior to randomization was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 3 to 7 days). Clinical status on the ordinal outcome scale at 14 days did not significantly differ between the hydroxychloroquine and placebo groups (median [IQR] score,[6][7] vs 6 [4-7]; aOR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.73 to 1.42]). None of the 12 secondary outcomes were significantly different between groups. At 28 days after randomization, 25 of 241 patients (10.4%) in the hydroxychloroquine group and 25 of 236 (10.6%) in the placebo group had died (absolute difference, −0.2% [95% CI, −5.7% to 5.3%]; aOR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.54 to 2.09]).CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among adults hospitalized with respiratory illness from COVID-19, treatment with hydroxychloroquine, compared with placebo, did not significantly improve clinical status at day 14. These findings do not support the use of hydroxychloroquine for treatment of COVID-19 among hospitalized adults.

Credible learning of hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone effects on COVID-19 mortality outside of randomized trials

“…If mortality worsened from one cohort to the next by even 0.3 percentage points, then hydroxychloroquine must have had a statistically significant harmful effect. These results are consistent with evidence from randomized trials testing hydroxychloroquine for early treatment of mild COVID-19 in adults [11], for reduced mortality among hospitalized patients (RECOVERY trial [12,13]), or prophylactic protection against infection among exposed participants [14], all of which concluded hydroxychloroquine had null or potentially harmful effects on their varied outcomes.…”

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of hydroxychloroquine and a retrospective study in adult patients with mild to moderate coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

“…The outcome of this RCT may assist the Taiwan CDC in its decision to release quarantined patients when medical resources are in short supply. Another limitation of the study was that the mean patient age (SD) was 32.9 (10.7) y as opposed to 51.1 y (13.9) for Borba et al, 45.1 y for Gautret et al, 44.7 y (15.3) for Chen et al, 46.1 y (14.7) for Tang et al, and 63.7 (16.5) for Arshad et al [15,27,[30][31][32]. For this reason, the observed rates of cardiac and retinal toxicity were low in the present study.…”

Nanocarrier vaccines for SARS-CoV-2

“…Soon remdesivir received a EUA by the USA FDA for COVID-19 that included all age groups independent of disease severity [ 48 , 50 ]. However, on November 9 th , 2020, a follow on study concluded no clinical benefit for remdesivir in hospitalized patients [ 51 ]. Ribavirin: Ribavirin is a guanine nucleoside analog that prevents viral replication by acting on the viral RdRp.…”