2018
DOI: 10.1002/pc.24925
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of hybrid wollastonite with different nucleation and morphology on the crystallization and mechanical properties of polypropylene

Abstract: In order to prepare polypropylene (PP) composites with balanceable stiffness and toughness, hybrid wollastonite with different nucleation and morphology as fillers were added into PP matrix. Nucleation efficiency (NE), crystallization behavior and melting characteristics, as well as the mechanical properties of hybrid wollastonite-filled PP composites were systematically investigated using differential scanning calorimetry, wide-angle X-ray diffraction, mechanical testing, and scanning electron microscopy, res… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(38 reference statements)
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to confirm that β-PP was not formed in CC/PP and TAMCC/PP, the XRD patterns of neat PP, CC/PP, and TAMCC/PP were measured (Figure 5b). There were five peaks at 2θ = 14.5 040), ( 130), (111), and (131) planes of α-PP, respectively [8,36,38]. It could be found that both XRD patterns of CC/PP and TAMCC/PP were similar with that of neat PP without showing the representative peaks of β-PP, further verifying that both CC and TAMCC could not toughen PP by the formation of β-PP as described above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to confirm that β-PP was not formed in CC/PP and TAMCC/PP, the XRD patterns of neat PP, CC/PP, and TAMCC/PP were measured (Figure 5b). There were five peaks at 2θ = 14.5 040), ( 130), (111), and (131) planes of α-PP, respectively [8,36,38]. It could be found that both XRD patterns of CC/PP and TAMCC/PP were similar with that of neat PP without showing the representative peaks of β-PP, further verifying that both CC and TAMCC could not toughen PP by the formation of β-PP as described above.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In turn, better mobility would also promote the dispersion of nanofillers, i.e., TAMCC. Furthermore, it could be also found that all of the DSC melting curves of neat PP, CC/PP, and TAMCC/PP manifested only a single melting peak at the temperature higher than 160 • C, which was the representative melting peak of α-PP, suggesting that the addition of CC or TAMCC could not result in the formation of any other crystal types in PP [31,35,36]. As is well known, PP can be categorized into three classes based on the crystal form, i.e., the monoclinic, trigonal, and orthorhombic types, corresponding to α-, β-, and γ-PP, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…New PP composites were developed by hybridizing wollastonite with different nucleation and morphology namely acicular wollastonite (AW), ultrafine wollastonite (BW) and W x , shown in Figure . The results showed that W x /AW and W x /BW fillers increased the tensile and flexural modulus of PP composites.…”
Section: Tensile and Flexural Properties Of Polymer Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reinforcing wollastonite and toughening of β‐crystal synergistically improved the mechanical properties of W x reinforced PP. Similarly, the impact strength improvements by W x /AW and W x /BW fillers were attributed to the induction of β‐phase by W x . Results obtained in work of Meng and Dou revealed that untreated wollastonite decreased the impact strength but various loadings of W x improved the impact strength of PP/wollastonite composites .…”
Section: Impact Properties Of Polymer Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%