2020
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.14702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heat pretreatment before isoelectric solubilisation/precipitation on the characteristics of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis) and Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) protein isolates

Abstract: Comparison of the characteristics of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis) and Antarctic krill (Euphausia superba) protein isolates with and without heat pretreatment before ISP.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the AA content in LPC reported herein was higher than the AA content of other marine molluscs, for example, pearl mussel protein isolate (65.73 g/100 g) . In addition, the EAA content of the LPC herein was numerically lower than that reported for other mollusc and crustacean samples, such as oyster protein isolate (47 ± 1%) and krill protein isolate (50.9 ± 0.9%) …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the AA content in LPC reported herein was higher than the AA content of other marine molluscs, for example, pearl mussel protein isolate (65.73 g/100 g) . In addition, the EAA content of the LPC herein was numerically lower than that reported for other mollusc and crustacean samples, such as oyster protein isolate (47 ± 1%) and krill protein isolate (50.9 ± 0.9%) …”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Following isolation, the protein content in the LPC was increased to 66.01 ± 1.67%. Similarly, in a study conducted by Zheng et al on marine molluscs and crustaceans, the protein contents of oyster (Crassostrea hongkongensis) and krill (Euphausia superba) protein isolates obtained using a pH-shift approach were reported to be 67.42 ± 0.65 and 54.27 ± 0.25% (dry weight basis), respectively. However, the authors did not provide the N conversion factor used in that study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation