1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(99)00166-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of glass short-range order on crystallization onset in Al–Y–Ni glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the crystallization products after the first transformation stage are so different between the Y alloy and the other two alloys, activation energy for the Y alloy is only slightly lower than that in the case of the Ce and Mm alloys (2.5 eV and 2.8-2.9 eV, respectively). Similar values of E a have been observed for Al 85 (NiY) 15 series of alloys for the primary crystallization ($3 eV) [15], although lower values were found for the primary crystallization of Albased alloys with low RE content, 3 at.% ($1.5 eV) [16]. At the last crystallization stage (which yields to the stable phases Al 11 Mm 3 , Al 11 Ce 3 and Al 3 Y for the Mm, Ce and Y alloys, respectively) E a is very similar in all the studied cases ($1.7 eV).…”
Section: Non-isothermal Crystallization Kineticssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Although the crystallization products after the first transformation stage are so different between the Y alloy and the other two alloys, activation energy for the Y alloy is only slightly lower than that in the case of the Ce and Mm alloys (2.5 eV and 2.8-2.9 eV, respectively). Similar values of E a have been observed for Al 85 (NiY) 15 series of alloys for the primary crystallization ($3 eV) [15], although lower values were found for the primary crystallization of Albased alloys with low RE content, 3 at.% ($1.5 eV) [16]. At the last crystallization stage (which yields to the stable phases Al 11 Mm 3 , Al 11 Ce 3 and Al 3 Y for the Mm, Ce and Y alloys, respectively) E a is very similar in all the studied cases ($1.7 eV).…”
Section: Non-isothermal Crystallization Kineticssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The latter phase decomposes into two phases -fcc Al and an unidentified intermetallic compound with a primitive cubic structure. An increase of Y content in Al-RE-TM alloy from 5 to 10 at.% leads to an increase of the temperature of primary crystallization from 508 to 565.5 K. These data [5] are in some disagreement with the data of Gogebakan and Uzun [6] who also investigated crystallization of Al 85 Y x Ni 15Àx (x = 5, 10) glasses. According to their data the primary crystallization temperatures are lower and vary from 503 (for x = 5) to 525 K (for x = 10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A series of Al 85 Y x Ni 15Àx (x = 5, 7, 8, 10) glasses have been investigated by Saini et al [5]. The three-step crystallization behavior has been found for x = 5 and 7, while for those with x = 8 and 10 the crystallization occurs in four steps.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change of the second peak suggests that the amorphous structure unit of the second peak is influenced by the pre-annealing temperatures. Structure relaxation, which allows atoms rearrangements in the amorphous matrix to get better atomic packing degree, can reduce the free-volume (quenchedin defect concentration) and retard the mobility of atoms [5,14]. Here, we assume that the embryo clusters of nuclei become more stable, because of local atoms rearrangement, to favorably initiate the second stage crystallization during isothermal annealing below 533 K. As a reflection, the second peak gradually overlaps with the first peaks with increasing pre-annealing temperature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%