1996
DOI: 10.1029/95jd02595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of fuel composition on combustion efficiency and emission factors for African savanna ecosystems

Abstract: Savanna burning in Africa occurs over a wide range of environmental, vegetation, and land use conditions. The emission factors for trace emissions from these fires can vary by a factor of 6 to 8, depending on whether the fires burn in miombo woodlands or in ecosystems where grass vegetation dominates. Ground‐based measurements of smoke emissions and aboveground biomass were made for fires in grassland and woodland savanna ecosystems in South Africa and Zambia. A high combustion efficiency ( trueη⌢ ) was measur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
200
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(207 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
200
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Measurements made by Ward et al [1992Ward et al [ , 1996 in the regional haze generated by African savanna and Brazilian fires measured around 3% BC in smoldering fires and $15-20% in active flaming combustion with the exact aerosol makeup being highly dependent on the type of vegetation. However, we see that our measurements of BC in the burning season lie between these two fire regimes suggesting that the air sampled over the Darwin area contained a mix of fire plumes generated in both active and smoldering fires further inland as might be expected.…”
Section: Aerosol Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements made by Ward et al [1992Ward et al [ , 1996 in the regional haze generated by African savanna and Brazilian fires measured around 3% BC in smoldering fires and $15-20% in active flaming combustion with the exact aerosol makeup being highly dependent on the type of vegetation. However, we see that our measurements of BC in the burning season lie between these two fire regimes suggesting that the air sampled over the Darwin area contained a mix of fire plumes generated in both active and smoldering fires further inland as might be expected.…”
Section: Aerosol Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Published emission factors for CO 2 are 1393 -1620 gm pollutant/kg biofuel with carbon content ranging from 41.8-50% Zhang et al, 2000;Brocard et al, 1998;Smith et al, 1993;; if we adopt a 50% carbon content, the emission factor range is reduced to 1551-1664 gm CO 2 /kg biofuel. The distribution of carbon in the products from biomass burning: CO 2 , CO, CH 4 , NMHC, TSP, ash, and uncombusted fuel, is strongly influenced by the temporal pattern of flaming and smoldering (more and less efficient combustion, respectively) in the burning process [Brocard et al, 1998;Jenkins and Turn, 1994;Ward et al, 1996;Joshi et al, 1989].…”
Section: Appendix C: Emission Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[143] The emission factors of trace gases from biomass combustion are influenced by several factors including the actual amount of carbon in the preburned dry matter, the size, shape and moisture content of the sample, and the flaming versus smoldering pattern of the burning process [Ward et al, 1996]. Most published emission factors are based on emission ratios using a carbon balance method which requires knowing the carbon content of the fuel.…”
Section: Appendix C: Emission Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focused on CO, CH 4 , and CO 2 . However, since the Modified Combustion Efficiency (MCE, defined as the amount of C released as CO 2 divided by the amount of C released as CO 2 plus CO ) has been used as an effective predictor for the emission of smoke gas composition from biomass fires (e.g., Ward et al, 1996;Sinha et al, 2003;Yokelson et al, 2003) and for certain aerosol species and characteristics (e.g., McMeeking et al, 2009;Janhäll et al, 2010), our findings on CO and CO 2 EFs can be used to better understand emissions of other trace gases and aerosols as well. We restricted our analysis to in situ measurements due to the focus on spatio-temporal variability as a result of variability in vegetation and climatic conditions; laboratory measurements of EFs were not taken into account.…”
Section: T T Van Leeuwen and G R Van Der Werf: Spatio-temporal Vamentioning
confidence: 99%