2013
DOI: 10.1017/s1751731112001565
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of forage particle length on rumen fermentation, sorting and chewing activity of late-lactation and non-lactating dairy cows

Abstract: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of varying forage particle length on chewing activity, sorting behavior, rumen pH and rumen fill in late lactation and dry dairy cattle, fed rations with similar physically effective NDF but different mean particle length. Treatments consisted of three diets differing only in geometric mean length of forage: hay (5.40, 8.96 and 77.90 mm, for short (S), medium (M) and long (L) diets, respectively) for Experiment 1 (E1), and straw (10.16, 24.68 and 80.37 m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
19
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This was not expected, as changing forage particle size has been shown to affect time spent chewing for oat silage, corn silage, and alfalfa hay (Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003;Leonardi et al, 2005b;Kahyani et al, 2013). However, Suarez-Mena et al (2013) did not find a difference in time spent eating, chewing, or ruminating for nonlactating cows fed a diet differing in straw particle size, which is consistent with the findings of the current study. It may be that the difference between treatments in straw particle size, in both studies, was not large enough to elicit a response in chewing time.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This was not expected, as changing forage particle size has been shown to affect time spent chewing for oat silage, corn silage, and alfalfa hay (Kononoff and Heinrichs, 2003;Leonardi et al, 2005b;Kahyani et al, 2013). However, Suarez-Mena et al (2013) did not find a difference in time spent eating, chewing, or ruminating for nonlactating cows fed a diet differing in straw particle size, which is consistent with the findings of the current study. It may be that the difference between treatments in straw particle size, in both studies, was not large enough to elicit a response in chewing time.…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In our study, the possible reason of shorter time period and lesser eating rate for animals consuming the LF diet in both FL and SL was lower NDF content and lesser DMI. Similar findings have also been reported in the literature (Suarez‐Mena et al., ; Giger‐Reverdin et al., ). The higher time consuming of H:C in both FL and SL was due to high NDF content and higher DMI (DeVries et al., ; Suarez‐Mena et al., ) of H:C in FL and SL.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cows fed alfalfa hay with a particle size of 30 mm had longer eating times than cows fed the same hay with a particle size of 15 mm [24], whereas time spent eating, time spent ruminating and total time spent chewing were not significantly different in cows fed hay with particles measuring 5.40, 8.96 and 77.90 mm [25]. On the other hand, eating minutes per kilogram dry matter intake and neutral detergent fibre intake tended to increase linearly as forage length increased [25]. The number of daily rumination phases of 10 to 20 observed in this study was in agreement with published numbers [14,18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%