2014
DOI: 10.4103/0972-0707.124132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: Objective:To evaluate the effect of final rinsing solution on smear layer removal through penetrability of the root canal sealer.Materials and Methods:Each of the 30 teeth selected was decoronated and the root length standardized at 16 mm measured from the apex of the tooth to the cementoenamel junction (CEJ). A size 10-k file was used and working length was determined by subtracting 1mm from the measured length so that the length of the sample was 15mm. A combination of step back and crown down technique was … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Horizontal sectioning followed in the present study eliminates the aforementioned possibility of missing areas to understand the depth of sealer penetration. In study done by Shenoy et al, 26 the depth of sealer penetration in EDTA group was 384.8μm and 425 μm in MTAD group, which is different from our study of 154.95μm in EDTA group and 231.37μm in MTAD group. The difference in the values can be because of the type of sealer used ie Acroseal (Septodont) a calcium hydroxide based sealer and method of assessing sealer penetration using confocal laser scanning microscope as compared SEM and use of resin based AH plus sealer in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Horizontal sectioning followed in the present study eliminates the aforementioned possibility of missing areas to understand the depth of sealer penetration. In study done by Shenoy et al, 26 the depth of sealer penetration in EDTA group was 384.8μm and 425 μm in MTAD group, which is different from our study of 154.95μm in EDTA group and 231.37μm in MTAD group. The difference in the values can be because of the type of sealer used ie Acroseal (Septodont) a calcium hydroxide based sealer and method of assessing sealer penetration using confocal laser scanning microscope as compared SEM and use of resin based AH plus sealer in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Shenoy et al .,[ 19 ] compared the smear layer removal efficacy of Tublicid plus, MTAD, EDTA and found that Tublicid plus and MTAD are better when compared to EDTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Root canal filling may also entomb any residual bacteria within the tubules and the chemical components of the sealer may exert an antibacterial effect 3 . Penetration of sealer into dentinal tubules is influenced by smear layer removal, by irrigation solutions and the filling technique [4][5] . During chemo-mechanical preparation, an amorphous layer of organic and inorganic materials, known as smear layer, is formed on the root canal walls [6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%