Effect of Educational Intervention on Self-Sampling Acceptability and Follow-Up Paps in Border Dwelling Hispanic Females

Molokwu, Jennifer; Peñaranda, Eribeth; Dwivedi, Alok; Mallawaarachchi, Indika; Shokar, Navkiran K.

doi:10.1097/lgt.0000000000000424

Cited by 8 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] Several values and preferences studies were nested within larger studies (often RCTs). [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Study populations typically included adult end users. Participants ranged in age from 14 to 80 years.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…29 Five studies employed a multimethod or mixed methods design. 47 67-70 A total of 58 studies employed a quantitative approach: 47 cross-sectional studies, 41-46 48 50-63 65 66 71-94 two pre-post surveys, 64 95 eight RCTs [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] and one prospective cohort. 49 Quantitative studies examined a wide range of end users, including underscreened and vulnerable subpopulations such as women living HIV, 51 60 61 transmales 62 and female sex workers.…”

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

IntroductionThe WHO recommends human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical self-sampling as an additional screening method and HPV DNA testing as an effective approach for the early detection of cervical cancer for women aged ≥30 years. This systematic review assesses end user’s values and preferences related to HPV self-sampling.MethodsWe searched four electronic databases (PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature and Embase) using search terms for HPV and self-sampling to identify articles meeting inclusion criteria. A standardised data extraction form was used to capture study setting, population, sample size and results related to values and preferences.ResultsOf 1858 records retrieved, 72 studies among 52 114 participants published between 2002 and 2018 were included in this review. Almost all studies were cross-sectional surveys. Study populations included end users who were mainly adolescent girls and adult women. Ages ranged from 14 to 80 years. Most studies (57%) were conducted in high-income countries. Women generally found HPV self-sampling highly acceptable regardless of age, income or country of residence. Lack of self-confidence with collecting a reliable sample was the most commonly cited reason for preferring clinician-collected samples. Most women preferred home-based self-sampling to self-sampling at a clinic. The cervical swab was the most common and most accepted HPV DNA sampling device.ConclusionsHPV self-sampling is generally a highly accepted method of cervical cancer screening for end users globally. End user preferences for self-sampling device, method and setting can inform the development of new and expanded interventions to increase HPV screening.

show abstract

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning

confidence: 99%

HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This theory states that the perception of health risks and benefits is the precondition for improvement, and if people do not have knowledge of how their lifestyle behaviours relate to their health, they may have little reasons to support activities or attempts to change those unhealthy habits. 26,35,36 In contrast with the normal treatment group, women in the intervention group were 1.5 times more likely to report getting a Pap smear during the last year. Community therapy focused on the wellbeing belief model and GATHER counselling measures was used in another report.…”

Section: Cervical Cancer Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Both statistical estimates of the individual and combined study effects of interventions in meta-analyses were developed using the odds ratio and random effects models. [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] The details of authors, study population, country, study design and sampling techniques used and outcome measures of intervention group and control group as well as the p values are entered in Table 2.…”

Section: Data Synthesismentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Such initiatives not only increased women's cervical cancer screening rates, but also strengthened visibility, knowledge of cervical cancer, screening significance, and provided barrier advice and guidance on when and how to do CCS, thus improving the overall chances of qualified women turning up or scheduling cervical cancer screening. 26,31,32 We have faith in the findings and encourage the use of educational approaches to improve women's participation in cervical screening programs, because only high-quality studies have been checked.…”

Section: Cervical Cancer Educationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of educational intervention on cervical cancer screening uptake among reproductive age women

Akinola

Constance

2021

Int J Community Med Public Health

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this review is to examine the efficacy of educational approaches in increasing women's adoption of cervical screening. A search was conducted through PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar. Articles that met the eligibility criteria were reviewed. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guided the data synthesis and reporting. We conducted a qualitative synthesis of evidence and pooled individual research results in meta-analyses using RevMan 5.3 review manager, where applicable. Heterogeneity has been estimated for total summary results of studies pooled together. Quality analysis of the papers was done using JADAD scale. This meta-analysis included a total of nine articles (n=2316). Statistical research findings indicate that the use of cervical cancer educational approaches substantially improved cervical cancer screening rates and screening acceptability by double folds 2.88. The results of this study support the use of educational intervention for cervical cancer to increase the acceptance of cervical cancer screening by women. We also recommend more research to assess the efficacy of various teaching approaches and the effect of intervention length on the rise in women's cervical cancer screening services utilization.

show abstract

HPV Testing Behaviors and Willingness to Use HPV Self-sampling at Home Among African American (AA) and Sub-Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) Women

Adegboyega

Wiggins

Williams

et al. 2021

J. Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Effect of Educational Intervention on Self-Sampling Acceptability and Follow-Up Paps in Border Dwelling Hispanic Females

Abstract: We found a high level of acceptability of self-sampling regardless of intensity of education in a largely Hispanic female population living on the US-Mexico border and a trend toward increased Pap smear follow-up in participants who tested positive.

Cited by 8 publications

References 25 publications

HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences

HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening: a systematic review of values and preferences

Impact of educational intervention on cervical cancer screening uptake among reproductive age women

HPV Testing Behaviors and Willingness to Use HPV Self-sampling at Home Among African American (AA) and Sub-Saharan African Immigrant (SAI) Women

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About