2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.archger.2003.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of donor age on cultivation of human oral mucosal keratinocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As previously reported, donor age is an important factor that significantly affects the culture of normal oral keratinocytes in vitro (Lauer et al , ; Grossman et al , ). Normal oral keratinocytes from older donors demonstrate weaker proliferative ability and longer incubation time to reach confluence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…As previously reported, donor age is an important factor that significantly affects the culture of normal oral keratinocytes in vitro (Lauer et al , ; Grossman et al , ). Normal oral keratinocytes from older donors demonstrate weaker proliferative ability and longer incubation time to reach confluence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In these studies, the plating efficiency of primary disaggregated skin cells was around 1% and increased to 5% for newborn donors . However, CFEs of epithelial cells in oral mucosa were higher than those of skin or limbus, depending on donor age . In plating efficiency experiments with the first passage (P1), the CFEs of primary cultured oral keratinocytes were up to 33%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 However, CFEs of epithelial cells in oral mucosa were higher than those of skin or limbus, 12 depending on donor age. 15 In plating efficiency experiments with the first passage (P1), the CFEs of primary cultured oral keratinocytes were up to 33%. Accordingly, CFEs were reportedly high in cells of later passages with fewer holoclone cells.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-the growth of multilayered epithelial transplants (so called "sheet grafts") [13,14,37,44,46,53,57,59,61,93,110,118,120,121,141,145]; -the construction of composite multi-layered dermalepidermal analogues [13, 18, 20, 24, 25, 30, 37, 41-43, 48, 52, 53, 59, 61, 63, 78, 81, 84, 110, 130, 133, 135-137, 143, 144, 147, 149]; -and the concept of preconfluent cell grafting [13, 19, 23, 29, 39, 47, 49, 50, 58-63, 67, 68, 76, 82-85, 87, 100, 126, 134, 141, 143, 145]. A summary of the most well known techniques to produce and apply cultured skin substitutes and most of the currently available methods and research directions can be found in Table 3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%