2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104757
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of curing mode on the conversion and IIT-derived mechanical properties of core build-up resin composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the hardness and degree of conversion measurements confirmed the superior performance of the DC over the SC polymerization modes in both dual-cure core build-up restoratives, which agrees with the conclusions of a recent work [8] and previous studies [4][5][6]. These differences were registered after a prolonged specimen storage (3 weeks, dark/dry conditions at 37 • C), a period that included the contribution of delayed post-curing effects [17], which are especially important for slow-setting self-curing materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the hardness and degree of conversion measurements confirmed the superior performance of the DC over the SC polymerization modes in both dual-cure core build-up restoratives, which agrees with the conclusions of a recent work [8] and previous studies [4][5][6]. These differences were registered after a prolonged specimen storage (3 weeks, dark/dry conditions at 37 • C), a period that included the contribution of delayed post-curing effects [17], which are especially important for slow-setting self-curing materials.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results showed that the effects of the two touch-cure mechanisms tested on the composite base conversion were similar, regardless of the light-activation status (light-curing of the activator-containing CB adhesive, self-curing of the GB adhesive with the GA activator). Moreover, the mechanism was efficient for both composite materials with a different monomer composition (the Bis-GMA-based CF and the aliphatic UDMA-based GC) and reactivity [4,8]. Therefore, the previously documented higher bond strength to root canal dentine of core build-up materials combined with light-cured activator containing adhesives in comparison with their dual-cured versions, may be rather associated with the adhesive film properties than the conversion of the main resin composite restorative, [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The degree of conversion can be determined using FTIR spectroscopy [ 27 ] and Raman spectroscopy [ 28 , 29 ]. Several methods exist for measuring the hardness of resin-based materials, including the Vickers [ 30 , 31 ], Knoop [ 24 , 29 ], and Martens hardnesses [ 32 , 33 ]. However, it is important to note that hardness measurements may not always be feasible, particularly if the dual-cure resin cement is too soft.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gel content and swelling ratio are usually used to characterize the crosslink density of composite materials. [19][20][21] In addition, some methods allow one or more reaction groups to be evaluated as a function of time, such as Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, [22][23][24][25] attenuation total reflectance Fourier transformation infrared spectrometry (ATR-FTIR) [26][27][28][29][30] and Raman spectroscopy. [31,32] To date, it seems that there is no study demonstrating the impact of the degree of C=C conversion (DC) on dielectric loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%