2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jastp.2018.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of convection on the thermal structure of the troposphere and lower stratosphere including the tropical tropopause layer in the South Asian monsoon region

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At an altitude of about 14 km, the temperature profiles of the convective overshooting and the mean temperature profiles become similar. From 14-to 18-km altitude, cooling temperature anomalies during convective overshooting are found, and the biggest anomalies (23.5 K for COSMIC; 24.1 K for ERA5; 23.8 K for JRA-55; 24 K for MERRA-2; 23 K for IGRA) appear at about 15-17-km altitude, which is consistent with previous study (Chae et al 2011;Kim et al 2018;Muhsin et al 2018;Johnston et al 2018). In the lower stratosphere (;17-10 km), the cooling anomalies caused by convective overshooting are obviously lower than that by normal convective based on the results from ERA5, JRA-55, and MERRA-2.…”
Section: Temperature Profiles Of the Convective Overshootingsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…At an altitude of about 14 km, the temperature profiles of the convective overshooting and the mean temperature profiles become similar. From 14-to 18-km altitude, cooling temperature anomalies during convective overshooting are found, and the biggest anomalies (23.5 K for COSMIC; 24.1 K for ERA5; 23.8 K for JRA-55; 24 K for MERRA-2; 23 K for IGRA) appear at about 15-17-km altitude, which is consistent with previous study (Chae et al 2011;Kim et al 2018;Muhsin et al 2018;Johnston et al 2018). In the lower stratosphere (;17-10 km), the cooling anomalies caused by convective overshooting are obviously lower than that by normal convective based on the results from ERA5, JRA-55, and MERRA-2.…”
Section: Temperature Profiles Of the Convective Overshootingsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In the lower stratosphere (;17-10 km), the cooling anomalies caused by convective overshooting are obviously lower than that by normal convective based on the results from ERA5, JRA-55, and MERRA-2. Moreover, warming anomalies appear in the lower stratosphere calculated by COSMIC and the biggest warming anomalies can reach to 1.2 K. Muhsin et al (2018) also find deep convection warm the lower stratosphere (17.5 km), with a sharp peak (;3 K). Near the tropopause (16 6 2 km), the difference between the temperature profiles of the convection and the mean temperature is lower than that between the temperature profiles of the convective overshooting and the mean temperature.…”
Section: Temperature Profiles Of the Convective Overshootingmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Figure 1 shown) shows the persistence of waves in the UTLS region on this day. There were several studies showing the influence of deep convection and waves on the temperature and water vapour in the UTLS region (eg: Suzuki et al, 2013;Sunilkumar et al, 2016;Muhsin et al, 2018). This cooler tropopause might be responsible for the freeze drying around this region resulting in a sharp minimum in WVMR close to the CPT.…”
Section: Altitude Distribution Of Lower Stratospheric Water Vapour Anmentioning
confidence: 99%