2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.07.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the continuous analysis of post-CRT-D LVEF, the estimated event rate still remained below 3.3% for post-CRT-D LVEF >45%. Although several studies have shown a reduction in the risk of ventricular arrhythmias [10][11][12][13][14]18,19 with CRT, no previous study has provided quantitative data on the relationship between the level of post-CRT-D LVEF and subsequent sustained VT or VF. This is particularly relevant because the guidelines for implantation of CRT devices are based, in part, on a critically low LVEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the continuous analysis of post-CRT-D LVEF, the estimated event rate still remained below 3.3% for post-CRT-D LVEF >45%. Although several studies have shown a reduction in the risk of ventricular arrhythmias [10][11][12][13][14]18,19 with CRT, no previous study has provided quantitative data on the relationship between the level of post-CRT-D LVEF and subsequent sustained VT or VF. This is particularly relevant because the guidelines for implantation of CRT devices are based, in part, on a critically low LVEF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such patients have been referred to as super-responders, 8,9 defined arbitrarily as a post-CRT LVEF of ≥45%. 8 Several studies have suggested that CRT can reduce the occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias, [10][11][12][13][14] but no data are available on the relationship of the post-CRT-D LVEF and subsequent occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). CRT-defibrillator (CRT-D) implantation guidelines depend on the LVEF as a measure of ventricular function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 Cases have been reported of CRT inducing ventricular arrhythmias, but several trials report a reduction in these events. [32][33][34][35][36] A review of the 2 largest CRT trials did not show significant increases or decreases in ventricular arrhythmia. 37 …”
Section: Patient Selection and Therapeutic Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, electrophysiologic effects of CRT are still poorly understood. Some studies demonstrated a decreased incidence of ventricular tachycardias (VTs) after CRT [9,10,[22][23][24][25][26][27]. In line with these findings, no significant proarrhythmic effects have been discovered in large-scale trials of CRT [4][5][6][7][8]19,20,28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%