2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of binder materials on cycling performance of Fe2O3 electrodes in alkaline solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some PVDF‐based copolymers including poly(vinylidene fluoride–tetrafluoroethylene–propyl­ene) (PVDF–TFE) and poly(vinylidene fluoride‐ co ‐hexafluoropropylene (PVDF–HFP) have been shown to be more flexible alternatives owing to suppression of PVDF crystallization due to copoly­merization leading to potential applications in silicon, tin, and metal oxide‐based anodes that though readily bonded by any of these materials, can exhibit as much as a 400% volume change during electrochemical cycling. Results from a recent study comparing the effectiveness of four binder materials (poly­tetraflouroethylene (PTFE), PVDF, polyethyl­ene (PE) and P(TFE–VDF)) on electrochemical properties of Fe 2 O 3 electrodes indicated that while PTFE‐based electrodes showed best capacity retention, PE‐based electrodes exhibit the highest discharge capacity. This last result is not easily correlated with any of the physical or chemical characteristics of the four polymers.…”
Section: Nanocomposite Applications In Lithium Battery Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some PVDF‐based copolymers including poly(vinylidene fluoride–tetrafluoroethylene–propyl­ene) (PVDF–TFE) and poly(vinylidene fluoride‐ co ‐hexafluoropropylene (PVDF–HFP) have been shown to be more flexible alternatives owing to suppression of PVDF crystallization due to copoly­merization leading to potential applications in silicon, tin, and metal oxide‐based anodes that though readily bonded by any of these materials, can exhibit as much as a 400% volume change during electrochemical cycling. Results from a recent study comparing the effectiveness of four binder materials (poly­tetraflouroethylene (PTFE), PVDF, polyethyl­ene (PE) and P(TFE–VDF)) on electrochemical properties of Fe 2 O 3 electrodes indicated that while PTFE‐based electrodes showed best capacity retention, PE‐based electrodes exhibit the highest discharge capacity. This last result is not easily correlated with any of the physical or chemical characteristics of the four polymers.…”
Section: Nanocomposite Applications In Lithium Battery Electrodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Iron oxides like magnetite (Fe 3 O 4 ), maghemite (c-Fe 2 O 3 ), and hematite (a-Fe 2 O 3 ) have been extensively investigated because of its magnetic, optical, and catalytic properties, as well as its low cost. They have been used as catalyst, adsorbents for organic or inorganic polluents, 1,2 as electrodes in batteries, 3 and for bioapplications. 4 In particular, magnetic iron oxides show interesting responses to external magnetic fields, which are suitable for clinical diagnosis, medical therapy, 5 and magnetic separation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Also here PEG (20 wt%) and PAANa promotes much severer capacity degradation, in particular during the first 10 cycles. Some amount of loaded Fe 3 O 4 might be exfoliated with coated polymer during these cycles.…”
Section: ¹1mentioning
confidence: 89%