2019
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.8145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of 1-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Clopidogrel vs 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy on Cardiovascular and Bleeding Events in Patients Receiving PCI

Abstract: IMPORTANCE Very short mandatory dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent may be an attractive option. OBJECTIVE To test the hypothesis of noninferiority of 1 month of DAPT compared with standard 12 months of DAPT for a composite end point of cardiovascular and bleeding events. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial enrolling 3045 patients who underwent PCI at 90 hospitals in Japan from December 2015 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
437
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 625 publications
(459 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
15
437
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary endpoint (bleeding events) occurred less frequently in the monotherapy arm than in the DAPT arm (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.68, p < 0.001), with no difference in ischemic endpoints (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). This strategy of short, uniform de-escalation, irrespective of PFT results, has also been supported by other recent trials involving several thousand patients and showing that rapid de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy was effective and associated with fewer bleeding events after ACS, including STEMI [75,76].…”
Section: Do Platelet Function Tests Help To Avoid Bleeding Events?mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The primary endpoint (bleeding events) occurred less frequently in the monotherapy arm than in the DAPT arm (hazard ratio = 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.68, p < 0.001), with no difference in ischemic endpoints (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). This strategy of short, uniform de-escalation, irrespective of PFT results, has also been supported by other recent trials involving several thousand patients and showing that rapid de-escalation of antiplatelet therapy was effective and associated with fewer bleeding events after ACS, including STEMI [75,76].…”
Section: Do Platelet Function Tests Help To Avoid Bleeding Events?mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…As described in Figure 1 patients met our eligibility criteria. [11][12][13][14] Of these, 14 530 patients were randomized to monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor, whereas 14 599 patients were randomized to standard dual antiplatelet therapy. Four trials tested P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy after 1 to 3 month of DAPT vs P2Y12 inhibitor plus aspirin ( Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The findings of the SMART-CHOICE trial and the STOPDAPT-2 trial showed that monotherapy with a P2Y12 inhibitor after shortduration dual antiplatelet therapy was noninferior to 12-month DAPT in the Asian patients who were at lower risk for ischemic events. 12,13 There was no restriction on the type of P2Y12 inhibitors in the SMART-CHOICE trial. On the contrary, the STOPDAPT-2 trial is limited by the exclusive use of clopidogrel.…”
Section: Platelet Activation and Aggregation Play Key Roles In Initiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these circumstances, the benefit of sustained DAPT may translate into a smaller absolute ischemic event risk reduction, which might be potentially outweighed by the associated higher risk of bleeding [6]. Since aspirin yields limited additional platelet inhibition when associated with P2Y 12 inhibitors, aspirin-free strategies have been evaluated in several recent randomized controlled trials enrolling ACS or PCI patients; in some of these studies patients also had an indication for chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. Most of these trials (but not all) reported lower rates of bleeding without aspirin, but all of them were underpowered as to properly evaluate the associated ischemic risk.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%