[Retracted] Effect Evaluation of Bronchial Artery Embolization for Hemoptysis of Lung Cancer and Changes in Serum Tumor Markers and miR‐34 Levels

Abstract

The clinical efficacy, serum tumor markers, and miR-34 expression levels of bronchial artery embolization (BAE) in patients with lung cancer with hemoptysis are investigated. 92 patients with lung cancer hemoptysis treated in our hospital from January 2019 to December 2021 are randomly selected, and 92 patients are randomly divided into the conservative group and the BAE group according to the number table method, with 46 patients in each group. The efficacy, overall survival (OS) rate, coagulation function, hemoptysis volume, serum tumor markers, and miR-34 expression are compared among all groups at different time points. The experimental results show that the BAE treatment can promote the expression of miR-34 and inhibit the expression of tumor markers, so it can improve the efficacy of patients with lung cancer hemoptysis, improve the symptoms of hemoptysis and coagulation function, and prolong the life cycle of patients.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization vs. conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

“…This dual effect renders BACE more advantageous than systemic chemotherapy and BAI alone due to its better therapeutic efficacy without the concomitant increase in treatment-related adverse effects ( 26 ). Even in chemotherapy-insensitive recurrent lung cancer, mechanical embolization of the bronchial arteries alone is equally effective ( 27 ). Theoretically, BACE can be performed in all types of lung cancer, and may be useful as long as the blood supply vessels are present, without the need for other relevant tests.…”

Retracted: Effect Evaluation of Bronchial Artery Embolization for Hemoptysis of Lung Cancer and Changes in Serum Tumor Markers and miR-34 Levels

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”