2006
DOI: 10.11606/issn.1678-4456.bjvras.2006.26536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efeito da adição de probiótico e/ou prebiótico em dietas de leitões desmamados sobre o desempenho, incidência de diarréia e contagem de coliformes totais

Abstract: ResumoNo Experimento 1 foram utilizados 50 leitões desmamados aos 21 dias de idade, alimentados com cinco dietas: T1 -Dieta Basal; T2 -Dieta Basal + Antibiótico; T3 -Dieta Basal + Probiótico; T4 -Dieta Basal + Prebiótico; T5 -Dieta Basal + Simbiótico. As variáveis estudadas foram ganho de peso, consumo de ração e conversão alimentar na Fase 1 (21 a 43 dias de idade), Fase 2 (44 a 57 dias de idade) , Fase 3 (58 a 70 dias de idade) e Fase Total (21 a 70 dias de idade). Durante o período do experimento de desempe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
1
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In relationship to feed conversion, the association interaction showed unfavorable result. These findings were contrary to those reported by Budiño et al (2006), in which the animals receiving the probiotic treatment containing B. licheniformis and B. subtillis principally, had lower average daily intake of feed compared to the control treatment with basal diet, and feed conversion was not influenced. In the final period of nursery, from 55 to 62 days, better feed conversion was observed in the ProbA group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In relationship to feed conversion, the association interaction showed unfavorable result. These findings were contrary to those reported by Budiño et al (2006), in which the animals receiving the probiotic treatment containing B. licheniformis and B. subtillis principally, had lower average daily intake of feed compared to the control treatment with basal diet, and feed conversion was not influenced. In the final period of nursery, from 55 to 62 days, better feed conversion was observed in the ProbA group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, other authors did not find the same answers. Budiño et al (2006), did not observe differences in the incidence of diarrhea in piglets who received B. licheniformis and B. subtilis, in the same way that Santos et al (1998) did not observe differences in the incidence of diarrhea when they administered Lactobacillus sp. Therefore, the results in the literature are controversial with respect to that variable, suggesting that differences found may be related to different types of probiotic bacteria, the dosage of the same, the amount of viable esporulo, besides the sanitary condition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Estudos têm comprovado que a suplementação de prebióticos melhora o desenvolvimento de suínos (ESTRADA e DREW et al, 2001;HE e BAIDOO et al, 2002), entretanto, outras investigações reportaram pouco ou nenhum efeito dos prebióticos sobre o desempenho de leitões (HOWARD et al, 1995;MIKKELSEN et al, 2003;BUDIÑO et al, 2006).…”
Section: Osunclassified
“…With regard to the symbiotic, Budiño et al (2006) observed better performance of piglets with the use of symbiotics, compared to the basal diet alone or with antibiotics or probiotics.The authors suggested that those results were related to a possible reduction of the coliforms in the jejunum. Nevertheless, they found no reduction in the incidence of diarrhea.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%