2015
DOI: 10.1177/1474904115615357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Educational reform and modernisation in Europe: The role of national contexts in mediating the new public management

Abstract: This article examines the spread of new public management (NPM) across European education\ud systems as it has traversed national boundaries. While recognising the transnational dimensions\ud of the spread of NPM, the authors offer new insights into the importance of national contexts in\ud mediating this development in educational settings by focusing upon NPM within three European\ud countries (England, Italy and Norway). We reveal its recontextualisation in these sites and the\ud interplay between NPM, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0
8

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
37
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…NPM emerged in the mid-1970s in Anglo-Saxon countries, especially Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom (Hood 1991;Gunter 2012). It spread to most OECD countries in the 1990s and became the world-dominant paradigm of public policies in the early 2000s (Hall et al 2015). Despite major differences between national cases, there have been several common trends in educational policies associated with NPM (Hood 1991), including the introduction of school autonomy and the professionalisation of principals, who have increasingly been chosen from professions other than teachers; national and international assessments (e. g. PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and cantonal standardized reference tests); the standardization of knowledge (from the 1998 English National Curriculum to the 2011-2014 Swiss Lehrplan 21/PER); and increased teacher accountability.…”
Section: New Public Management's Effects On Educational Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPM emerged in the mid-1970s in Anglo-Saxon countries, especially Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom (Hood 1991;Gunter 2012). It spread to most OECD countries in the 1990s and became the world-dominant paradigm of public policies in the early 2000s (Hall et al 2015). Despite major differences between national cases, there have been several common trends in educational policies associated with NPM (Hood 1991), including the introduction of school autonomy and the professionalisation of principals, who have increasingly been chosen from professions other than teachers; national and international assessments (e. g. PISA, TIMSS, PIRLS and cantonal standardized reference tests); the standardization of knowledge (from the 1998 English National Curriculum to the 2011-2014 Swiss Lehrplan 21/PER); and increased teacher accountability.…”
Section: New Public Management's Effects On Educational Institutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, such global influences are also often interpreted to lead to national developments that are directed towards achieving seemingly universal goals (Karseth & Sivesind, 2010;Pettersson, Prøitz, & Forsberg, 2017;Røvik, 2014;Simola, Rinne, Varjo, & Kauko, 2013). Nevertheless, local, regional and national variations more often characterize the field of education (Hall et al, 2015;Hopmann, 2008Hopmann, , 2015. Governance research that relies too much upon examining overall and national policies might lead to methodological nationalism (Chernilo, 2011;Sager, 2016), where the various levels of education are placed in the background and empirical, e.g.…”
Section: Domestic and Local Influences In Education Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects of PISA cannot be separated from the contextual forces of Neoliberalism upon global educational systems throughout the world (for example, Hall et al, 2015;Savage et al, 2013) which has implications for social justice and the organisation of society (Rezai-Rashti et al, 2016). 'The globalisation of education' has resulted in increased global inequalities (Zajda, 2015;Connell, 2013), notwithstanding, the confusions and challenges of implementing global educational reforms (O'Leary & Wood, 2016).…”
Section: Educational Practice and Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%