2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2018.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editorial commentary: The lower the LDL the better but how and how much?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the aforementioned pathogenesis, lowering LDL levels is currently considered a basic treatment approach for atherosclerosis in clinical practice. Although effective methods including statins and preprotein invertase Bacillus subtilis invertase/Kexin9 (PCSK9) inhibitors inhibit the levels of circulating LDL to a certain extent, they have been linked to various adverse cardiovascular events, threatening the lives of patients [ 21 ]. For instance, a 2017 CANTOS trial [ 22 ] revealed that although canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-1 reduced the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), it significantly exacerbated the incidence of coinfections and sepsis.…”
Section: Atherosclerosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the aforementioned pathogenesis, lowering LDL levels is currently considered a basic treatment approach for atherosclerosis in clinical practice. Although effective methods including statins and preprotein invertase Bacillus subtilis invertase/Kexin9 (PCSK9) inhibitors inhibit the levels of circulating LDL to a certain extent, they have been linked to various adverse cardiovascular events, threatening the lives of patients [ 21 ]. For instance, a 2017 CANTOS trial [ 22 ] revealed that although canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits IL-1 reduced the incidence of adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), it significantly exacerbated the incidence of coinfections and sepsis.…”
Section: Atherosclerosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the wide body of evidence from clinical trials and from epidemiological, genetic, and experimental studies that consistently demonstrate that the lower the level of LDL-C, the lower the CVD risk, regardless of baseline LDL levels, an approach has emerged that lower LDL-C goals should be targeted, particularly for those in high CVD risk groups [2,3]. In the recently released ESC/EAS lipid guidelines, for example, there is a recommendation for a 50% or greater lowering of LDL-C and an LDL-C target of less than 55 mg/dL in very high risk CVD subjects [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%