2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Editor's Summary and Q&A

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Significantly decreased nasopharyngeal volumes were reported using computed tomography (CT) in patients presenting mandibular retrusion when compared to the ones presenting mandibular prognathism [8] and also if compared to control group without retrognathism [9]. On the contrary, significantly higher oropharyngeal volume was reported in Class III malocclusion patients when compared to Class I patients [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Significantly decreased nasopharyngeal volumes were reported using computed tomography (CT) in patients presenting mandibular retrusion when compared to the ones presenting mandibular prognathism [8] and also if compared to control group without retrognathism [9]. On the contrary, significantly higher oropharyngeal volume was reported in Class III malocclusion patients when compared to Class I patients [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%