2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00027-006-0858-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecosystem engineering: the impact of bioturbation on biogeochemical processes in marine and freshwater benthic habitats

Abstract: In aquatic ecosystems, invertebrate bioturbation signifi cantly infl uences microbial activities and biogeochemical processes in sediments by modifying water and sediment fl uxes at the water-sediment interface. We apply the concept of ecosystem engineering to develop a qualitative general understanding of the role of bioturbation on microbial processes in different benthic environments. We hypothesized that the effects of the bioturbation mode (sediment reworking, biogenic structure building, bioirrigation) o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
210
2
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(59 reference statements)
5
210
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The first event involves the appearance of a wide repertoire of behavioural strategies reflecting the interactions of newly developed, distinctive body plans with the substrate. Most of these interactions were characterized by the reworking of fine-grained sediments by sediment bulldozers in diffusion-dominated benthic systems [41], as typified by bioturbation in offshore deposits. This style of biogenic reworking was probably conducive to large-scale changes in both the sediment and the water column, including promotion of water fluxes at the sediment -water interface, average deepening of the redox discontinuity surface, release of nitrogen from the sediment, increase in the sedimentwater flux of iron and manganese, and several-fold increase in seawater sulfate concentration [41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first event involves the appearance of a wide repertoire of behavioural strategies reflecting the interactions of newly developed, distinctive body plans with the substrate. Most of these interactions were characterized by the reworking of fine-grained sediments by sediment bulldozers in diffusion-dominated benthic systems [41], as typified by bioturbation in offshore deposits. This style of biogenic reworking was probably conducive to large-scale changes in both the sediment and the water column, including promotion of water fluxes at the sediment -water interface, average deepening of the redox discontinuity surface, release of nitrogen from the sediment, increase in the sedimentwater flux of iron and manganese, and several-fold increase in seawater sulfate concentration [41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of these interactions were characterized by the reworking of fine-grained sediments by sediment bulldozers in diffusion-dominated benthic systems [41], as typified by bioturbation in offshore deposits. This style of biogenic reworking was probably conducive to large-scale changes in both the sediment and the water column, including promotion of water fluxes at the sediment -water interface, average deepening of the redox discontinuity surface, release of nitrogen from the sediment, increase in the sedimentwater flux of iron and manganese, and several-fold increase in seawater sulfate concentration [41,42]. By being the primary determinant of oxygen concentration in the sediment, bioturbation may have also influenced the biomass of organisms, the expansion of aerobic bacteria, the rate of organic matter decomposition and the regeneration of nutrients vital for primary productivity, among other aspects [43][44][45].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, bioturbators change sediment properties by their activity in sediment affecting the redox conditions and increasing DO supply to deeper layers (Mermillod-Blondin and Rosenberg, 2006). On the other hand, in the lining of burrows generated by macrofauna and their faecal pellets there are favourable conditions for microbial activity and nitrification (Blackburn and Henriksen., 1983;Henriksen et al, 1983;Kristensen et al, 1985).…”
Section: Benthic Fluxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many authors, such as Loassachan et al (2009), Mermillod-Blondin et al (2008), and Sarker et al (2009), have described the large number of factors that regulate the availability and regeneration of nutrients in inner shelve bottoms. The main factors are microbial community (Jørgensen, 2006), benthic macrofauna (Mermillod-Blondin and Rosenberg, 2006), quantity and quality of organic matter (Pastor et al, 2011) and benthic primary producers (Mermillod-Blondin et al, 2008) such as seagrasses, macroalgae, as well as microalgae, although a great number of environmental ones, such as temperature or light, can affect all of these.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To widen the generalizability of our conclusions, we examine the effects of chronic fishing disturbance and organic matter enrichment on nitrogen cycling in different sediment types; a diffusion dominated community (sandy mud) and an advection dominated community (sand). We assume that the level of biogeochemical performance that is realized in either sediment type will depend at least in part on the structure and composition of the post-disturbance macro-invertebrate community, as the active redistribution of particles and fluids by the macrofauna disproportionately influences benthic fluxes and total benthic metabolism (Mermillod-Blondin et al 2004;Mermillod-Blondin and Rosenberg 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%