1994
DOI: 10.1016/0305-750x(94)90145-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic returns to social power: Merchants' finance and interlinkage in the grain markets of Bangladesh

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the small trader who buys from the grower, the itinerant merchant who purchases the paddy in the village market, the paddy commission agent or wholesaler who assemblies the paddy, and the mill which processes the paddy into rice.' 10 Further, access to credit is vitally important in this chain (McGregor, 1989;Crow and Murshid, 1994). Our data are not rich enough to distinguish between prices at each level of this wholesale marketing chain.…”
Section: Testing For the Law Of One Price 481mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…the small trader who buys from the grower, the itinerant merchant who purchases the paddy in the village market, the paddy commission agent or wholesaler who assemblies the paddy, and the mill which processes the paddy into rice.' 10 Further, access to credit is vitally important in this chain (McGregor, 1989;Crow and Murshid, 1994). Our data are not rich enough to distinguish between prices at each level of this wholesale marketing chain.…”
Section: Testing For the Law Of One Price 481mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…When they do, median cash prices are 13% higher than credit prices. We therefore find little evidence that advances to farmers hide 'exploitative' practices by traders (Crow and Murshid 1994). Credit duration is a bit longer than with traders --14 days on average with a median of 7 days-but it is certainly shorter than the agricultural season.…”
Section: Payment Methods and Trade Creditmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…It is argued here that what superficially appears to be a case of varying degrees of exploitation within each exchange relationship, especially so for pickers at the hands of panni dealers, is really but a reflection of deep-rooted institutional oppression and dependence foisted on a particular group, in this case both pickers and panni dealers, by society. To clarify further, so-called exploitation of pickers by their dealers is best captured by modifying Crow and Murshid's (1994) working definition of power so: the economically more powerful party, 'bb' (of caste B), made the economically weaker party, 'b' (also of caste B), an offer which 'b' could not refuse because the choice sets faced by B are constrained by institutionalised discrimination on a broader societal level which leave no feasible alternative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crow and Murshid (1994) draw on Harsanyi (1962) for a working definition of the power of one trader over another, 'A made B an offer that B could not refuse' (Crow andMurshid, 1994: 1012). However, as market power derives from an unequal distribution of resources (assets, institutions, information) that are collectively rather than individually constituted, they propose a modified working definition of power: 'a (of social class A) made b (of B) an offer which b could not refuse because the options of B constrained by the options of A leave no feasible alternative' (Crow andMurshid, 1994: 1012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%