2011
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2011.909.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Economic Evaluation Between Chemical Thinning vs. Hand Thinning in 'Williams' Pear

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thinning can be done manually, mechanically and by using chemical thinners to save on labour cost and make better economic return (López et al, 2011;Stopar and Lokar, 2003;Greene and Costa, 2013). The chemical thinners may be consisted of various chemical compounds, but the application of plant growth regulators and some insecticides are of preference in this regard (Reyes et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thinning can be done manually, mechanically and by using chemical thinners to save on labour cost and make better economic return (López et al, 2011;Stopar and Lokar, 2003;Greene and Costa, 2013). The chemical thinners may be consisted of various chemical compounds, but the application of plant growth regulators and some insecticides are of preference in this regard (Reyes et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%