2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0959-6526(02)00046-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological footprint — a tool for assessing sustainable energy supplies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The EF is an indicator that considers the energy and raw materials fluxes to and from any particular system, converting them into spaces of land or water necessary by nature for producing and/or assimilating these fluxes. Although EF was firstly developed to account for the consumption of natural resources depending on the lifestyle of nations and regions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], improved methodologies allow the application of the EF to a wide variety of sectors and activities [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Pressure of nations on marine ecosystems has also been assessed by modified EF methodologies [6,[31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The EF is an indicator that considers the energy and raw materials fluxes to and from any particular system, converting them into spaces of land or water necessary by nature for producing and/or assimilating these fluxes. Although EF was firstly developed to account for the consumption of natural resources depending on the lifestyle of nations and regions [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], improved methodologies allow the application of the EF to a wide variety of sectors and activities [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Pressure of nations on marine ecosystems has also been assessed by modified EF methodologies [6,[31][32][33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to provide more detailed information for decision-makers, we should continue to calculate EFs of different industries in different regions of China in the future. Some regions in the world have done some such research successfully (Gössling et al 2002;IWM and BFF 2002;Stöglehner 2003;Barrett and Simmons 2003;Muñiz and Galindo 2005), and the more detailed the information, the better it is for the decision-making. …”
Section: Methodological Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This underestimation of the carbon sequestration area in the calculations of the EF gives the impression that biocapacity has grown as a result of industrialization [15]. In Section 3.1, it is suggested therefore that CO 2 emissions should be limited to the absorption of CO 2 by sustainable sinks, such as the lithosphere [16]. Thus, carbon must not be burned at a higher rate than it is absorbed by lithosphere.…”
Section: The Ecological Footprint (Ef)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Spain, this ratio dropped from 6.1 in the year 1950/51 to 1.27 in 1999 [18]. This input (which may be a large part of total output) is not subtracted from the output of intensive land use, resulting in an EF value which is far too small [16]. Taking into account the indirect upstream fossil fuel use of agriculture by considering all human CO 2 emissions does not compensate for this neglect of subtraction, since the CO 2 absorption areas evaluated in the EF are too small, because they do not store carbon permanently.…”
Section: The Ecological Footprint (Ef)mentioning
confidence: 99%