2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00968.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ecological and Economic Services Provided by Birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain Coffee Farms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
183
5
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 183 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(76 reference statements)
4
183
5
5
Order By: Relevance
“…If this higher production can offset yield lost on land protected for biodiversity, then sun coffee paired with preserved forest fragments may constitute land sparing. Despite a strong pattern suggesting that shade coffee supports greater biodiversity than sun monocultures (Armbrecht and Perfecto 2003, Philpott and Armbrecht 2006, Raman 2006, Kellermann et al 2008, Philpott et al 2012, there is no clear consensus regarding the effects of land sharing versus land sparing management strategies on biodiversity, in part because few studies have examined the differences explicitly (but see Phalan et al 2011 andChandler et al 2013). In addition, surrounding habitats can play a role, with adjacent forest being found to exert a stronger influence on bird populations than farm attributes such as the presence of shade trees (Bátary et al 2011).…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If this higher production can offset yield lost on land protected for biodiversity, then sun coffee paired with preserved forest fragments may constitute land sparing. Despite a strong pattern suggesting that shade coffee supports greater biodiversity than sun monocultures (Armbrecht and Perfecto 2003, Philpott and Armbrecht 2006, Raman 2006, Kellermann et al 2008, Philpott et al 2012, there is no clear consensus regarding the effects of land sharing versus land sparing management strategies on biodiversity, in part because few studies have examined the differences explicitly (but see Phalan et al 2011 andChandler et al 2013). In addition, surrounding habitats can play a role, with adjacent forest being found to exert a stronger influence on bird populations than farm attributes such as the presence of shade trees (Bátary et al 2011).…”
Section: List Of Tablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inclusion of shade trees could prompt a numerical response in both birds and ants foraging in coffee (Kellermann et al 2008, Van Bael et al 2008, Philpott et al 2009), reflecting the tendency of predators to aggregate in areas of high prey density (Godfray and Pacala 1992). Alternatively, higher pest removal with increasing shade cover may be due to a functional response, whereby birds are more likely to detect and consume large and profitable prey like caterpillars when they can search for them from above.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations