1963
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1963.01590230069011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eccrine Poroma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eccrine poroma is a fairly common cutaneous tumor, usually occurring as a solitary lesion (2). In approximately two‐thirds of cases, lesions occur on the soles or sides of the foot (18) with remainder occurring in order of decreasing frequency on the hands and fingers, but is rarely observed on the head, neck, and chest (19,20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eccrine poroma is a fairly common cutaneous tumor, usually occurring as a solitary lesion (2). In approximately two‐thirds of cases, lesions occur on the soles or sides of the foot (18) with remainder occurring in order of decreasing frequency on the hands and fingers, but is rarely observed on the head, neck, and chest (19,20).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recurrence after incomplete excision has occurred in different regions of the body. 2 – 4 For this reason, patients should be followed up with close observation for possible recurrence and the development of new lesions in other areas of the body. Histologically proven transformation of cases from benign to malignant tumors in other parts of the body have been reported in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of our cases occurred in the classical location, but while the sole is apparently a site of predilection, instances of eccrine poroma occurring on the palm, chest, back, and calf have been reported. [10][11][12][13] The clinical lesion was described in 1958 by Knox and Spiller.2 The protrusion of the tumor from a shallow cup-like invagination was considered a valuable diagnostic fea¬ ture. This was demonstrated in one of the cases reported by Hunter and Hellier10 and again emphasized in 1964 by Pinkus and Mehregan.14 The typical appearance of the lesion of our second patient permitted the diagnosis to be made on clinical grounds prior to histologie examination.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%