2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0007114520003864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EAT–Lancetdiet score requires minimum intake values to predict higher micronutrient adequacy of diets in rural women of reproductive age from five low- and middle-income countries

Abstract: The EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, Planet, Health promulgated a universal reference diet. Subsequently, researchers constructed an EAT-Lancet diet score (0-14 points), with lower bound intake values for various dietary components set at 0 g/d, and reported inverse associations with risks of major health outcomes in a high-income population. We assessed associations between EAT-Lancet diet scores, without or with (>0 g/d) minimum intake values, and the Mean Probability of Micronutrient Adequacy (MPA) in food… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this binary scoring system was shown to be negatively associated with nutrient adequacy in resource poor settings [32]. Hanley-Cook et al therefore suggest that minimum intake values (>0 g/d) should be used to avoid non-consumers of the nutrient dense dietary components score high on this index [32]. The WISH counteracts this drawback of the binary score by using a continuous scoring on a scale from 0 to 10, along with various sub-scores, rather than a binary scoring system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, this binary scoring system was shown to be negatively associated with nutrient adequacy in resource poor settings [32]. Hanley-Cook et al therefore suggest that minimum intake values (>0 g/d) should be used to avoid non-consumers of the nutrient dense dietary components score high on this index [32]. The WISH counteracts this drawback of the binary score by using a continuous scoring on a scale from 0 to 10, along with various sub-scores, rather than a binary scoring system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This index showed inverse associations with NCDs in a UK based population. However, this binary scoring system was shown to be negatively associated with nutrient adequacy in resource poor settings [32]. Hanley-Cook et al therefore suggest that minimum intake values (>0 g/d) should be used to avoid non-consumers of the nutrient dense dietary components score high on this index [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are familiar with the debate that has surrounded the EAT-Lancet diet due to methodological considerations, lack of adaptation to local contexts and different populations, and feasibility in terms of costs and missing environmental perspectives ( 12 , 30 , 46–49 ). Nevertheless, the considerable reductions in mortality shown in this study provide strong arguments for prioritizing healthy diets similar to the EAT-Lancet diet in policy, in education, and on the overall global agenda.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being inversely associated with diabetes and ischemic heart disease [ 10 ], this index does not consider all the possibilities of the EAT-Lancet recommendations, such as the minimum and maximum values [ 35 ]. In addition, this index was negatively associated with micronutrients adequacy among women in five low- and middle-income countries (LMCC) [ 36 ]. The PHDI has a gradual score, which allows for a better distinction between the degrees of adherence of individuals, favoring an interpersonal distribution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%